Plan for Change: Milestones for Mission-led Government Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord Hendy
Main Page: Lord Hendy (Labour - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Hendy's debates with the Leader of the House
(6 days, 12 hours ago)
Lords ChamberIf that is the best that the noble Baroness can do, I think that the Green Party will be disappointed by her interventions. Those people are not being excluded, but people who get pay packets are working people, which is why the milestone references working people. If she looks at the other measures that we have about child poverty, the triple lock and support for pensioners, she will see that all those are people for whom we want economic growth. I really am amazed that the noble Baroness thinks that economic growth can come only at the expense of the environment. I do not know whether she was here earlier today when I was talking about how we can have better houses, more houses and homes for people, and a better environment. The two are not mutually exclusive. I am disappointed, because I have to disagree with her: we want economic growth for the benefit of the country and the environment.
My Lords, my question also relates to the first of the six admirable milestones, on having higher
“living standards in every part of the United Kingdom”.
I looked at the document to see how that was to be achieved and saw three bullet points on page 22, the first of which is:
“Deliver growth by working in partnership with businesses”.
Of course, one understands that higher living standards cannot be achieved without working in partnership with businesses, but I was a little troubled by the fact that there was no reference to trade unions or the extension of collective bargaining. Does my noble friend agree that there is no possibility of improving the living standards of the 30 million employees and 4.25 million self-employed workers without the intervention of trade unions and the extension of collective bargaining?
As a member of a trade union myself, obviously I welcome the role of trade unions in business and working in partnership with business, and the benefits that brings to both, but I do not think that is something missing out here. What is focused on here is working in partnership and making sure that
“every nation and region realises its full potential”,
as well as driving
“innovation, investment and the adoption of technology to seize the opportunities … from artificial intelligence to net zero”,
to help
“people get a job, stay in work and progress in their careers”.
The trade union movement would sign up to all those, I would expect, because it wants the best for its workers, as we do as well.