House of Lords Act 1999 (Amendment) Bill [HL]

Debate between Lord Hayward and Baroness Chisholm of Owlpen

Friday 9th September 2016 Lords Chamber

[Baroness Chisholm of Owlpen]

I think my noble friend has already done that because his remarks will be in Hansard. I am sure they will take note.

[Lord Hayward (Con)]

Before my noble friend sits down, I have not spoken in this debate but I echo the comments made by other noble Lords that we believe this House is already far too large and should be reduced rapidly.

[Baroness Chisholm of Owlpen]

Noted.

Government Websites: Titles

Debate between Lord Hayward and Baroness Chisholm of Owlpen

Thursday 9th June 2016 Lords Chamber

[Lord Hayward]

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will take steps to allow people to include honours in titles when completing forms on government websites.

[Baroness Chisholm of Owlpen (Con)]

My Lords, this is a matter for individual departments, which are responsible for determining the level of information required for their online forms. However, my right honourable friend the Minister for the Cabinet Office has asked officials in the Government Digital Service to look into the feasibility of the proposal. I will write to my noble friend with the outcome of the review on completion.

[Lord Hayward (Con)]

I thank my noble friend for that very helpful Answer. Given that in two days’ time the Queen will announce the birthday honours, granting recognition to many people who have dedicated their lives to society at large and the community, or showed gallantry in the face of the enemy, it seems unfortunate that up to now—I note my noble friend’s Answer—government departments have not provided an appropriate field in “addresses” in order that the nation can continue to recognise the great public service that these people have given.

[Baroness Chisholm of Owlpen]

My Lords, I agree with my noble friend. Indeed, they have given great public service. Departments can agree requirements with the Government Digital Service to include a field for honours. This is a matter for individual departments, which are responsible for determining the level of information required in online forms. At present, there is nothing to stop someone putting their honours in the field after their surname, although this is not explicitly referred to in the explanations on the forms. Guidance to departments at present suggests a free-text field and not a drop-down list, as this would be too exhaustive to create.