Asked by: Lord Hannan of Kingsclere (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have made any representations to the government of Venezuela about the whereabouts of Jesús Armas and reports that he is being held in El Helicoide.
Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)
The UK strongly condemns the ongoing repression against civil society and members of the opposition in Venezuela. Over 1900 Venezuelans remain arbitrarily detained, including Jesus Armas whose whereabouts remain unknown. The UK has repeatedly called for human rights to be protected and for the immediate and unconditional release of those arbitrarily detained, most recently through a UK statement at the Human Rights Council on 13 December. The UK was also party to the G7 Foreign Ministers' statements of 24 September and 26 November, calling on Venezuelan representatives to publish the election results in full and calling for all unjustly detained political prisoners to be released.
Asked by: Lord Hannan of Kingsclere (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:
To ask His Majesty's Government what representations they have made to the government of Pakistan about the continuing detention of Imran Khan; and what assessment they have made of reports that he has been denied phone calls and visits.
Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
The Foreign Secretary met with Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar on 4 September and 24 October to discuss a range of key issues, including Pakistan's domestic political situation. We have consistently urged the Pakistani authorities to demonstrate their democratic credentials by acting in line with their international obligations and with respect for the fundamental freedoms of all its citizens, including the right to a fair trial, due process and humane detention.
Asked by: Lord Hannan of Kingsclere (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the remarks by the International Commission of Jurists that the passing of the 26th Constitutional Amendment by the government of Pakistan is a “blow to judicial independence, the rule of law, and human rights protection”; and what representations they have made to that government in that regard.
Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
Any amendment to Pakistan's constitution is a matter for Pakistan. An independent judiciary able to check and balance other state organs is a critical element of a functioning democracy.
Asked by: Lord Hannan of Kingsclere (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:
To ask His Majesty's Government what impediments remain in the way their ambition to eliminate tariffs on fresh produce imported from Morocco.
Answered by Lord Douglas-Miller
The Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and Department for Business and Trade (DBT) are working closely together to negotiate a balanced and equitable outcome for the Morocco Agriculture Tariff Review, which is a commitment both sides made under the UK-Morocco Association Agreement. We continue to work closely with the Moroccan government to further liberalise any remaining tariffs and maximise trade under the agreement. At the launch of the tariff review last year, we discussed a range of priority sectors, including fresh produce like fruits and vegetables which constitute around 35% of all goods imported from Morocco to the UK. Whilst we are keen to diversify the supply of imported Moroccan goods on UK shelves and seek opportunities to expand exports of British food and drink, we will ensure that this is not done at the expense of British farmers, their produce, and the seasonal nature of UK production more generally.
Asked by: Lord Hannan of Kingsclere (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Department for Business and Trade:
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will seek an investment facilitation memorandum between the UK and Morocco at the forthcoming Association Council to support UK investment in Morocco ahead of the 2030 World Cup, similar to the agreement signed with Peru ahead of the 2019 Pan-American Games.
Answered by Lord Johnson of Lainston
The UK Government is keen to strengthen trade ties with Morocco, which deliver mutual benefits. Both countries will be hosting major football tournaments later this decade, and the Government is working closely with Morocco to share knowledge ahead of the delivery of these events.
In 2017, HM Government signed a government-to-government agreement with Peru to support the delivery of infrastructure for the 2019 PanAmerican Games on-time and on-budget. We plan to share our experience with the Moroccan government at the forthcoming UK-Morocco Association Council.
Asked by: Lord Hannan of Kingsclere (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they consider that parliamentary ratification is needed for the World Health Organisation’s International Health Regulations (2005) as amended.
Answered by Lord Markham - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)
The International Health Regulations (2005) are an existing international legal instrument to which the United Kingdom and 195 other World Health Organization (WHO) Member States are party. The regulations are a key part of the global health security system to prevent, protect against, control, and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease.
At the WHO World Health Assembly (WHA) in May 2022, Member States including the UK agreed a process to negotiate and agree targeted amendments to the regulations and adopted five process-related amendments.
These amendments shorten the timeframes for future amendments to the regulations to come into force, namely 12 months with the possibility to extend up to 24 months, rather than 24 months, and for Member States to reject or reserve on them for 10 months rather than 18 months.
These amendments apply only to future Member State-agreed amendments to the regulations. The UK supports the amendments as they aim to improve the timeliness of Member States’ implementation of and compliance with the regulations, which helps to better protect the UK from future public health events including pandemics.
The 75th WHA also agreed the process for negotiating further targeted amendments to the regulations. Member States could submit proposed amendments for consideration and a Working Group (WGIHR), consisting of all Regulation State Parties, including the UK, through which the proposed amendments would be negotiated and agreed.
The Government continues to engage in the Member State-led WGIHR negotiation process, working to secure the best outcomes for the UK, as a means of strengthening preparedness for and response to future global health emergencies. Our priorities for the more than 300 proposed amendments continue to include increasing compliance with the regulations, improving transparency, and speeding up timeliness of reporting. No further amendments have been agreed yet. Member States agreed to submit a package of agreed amendments to the WHA in May 2024.
Amendments to the regulations must be adopted by Member States at the WHA for them to come into force as a matter of international law. A 10-month opt-out period for the more than 300 amendments will commence only if and when the amendments have been adopted by the WHA.
The Government has a strong commitment and duty to implement its international obligations. In addition, throughout negotiations, the UK has been and will continue to be clear that we would not agree any amendments that would cede sovereignty to the WHO, including in relation to making domestic decisions on national measures concerning public health, such as, domestic immunisation programme rollouts and other similar measures.
A Westminster Hall debate on the regulation amendments will be held on 18 December 2023. Any new or amended domestic legislation necessary to reflect new international obligations under the regulations would be made through the applicable parliamentary process. In all circumstances, the sovereignty of the UK Parliament would remain unchanged.
Asked by: Lord Hannan of Kingsclere (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to the 307 amendments to the World Health Organisation’s International Health Regulations (2005), proposed in May 2023, given the deadline for opting out of the regulations and that extended consideration period has now passed and that ten months remain for the UK to opt-out of the amendments.
Answered by Lord Markham - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)
The International Health Regulations (2005) are an existing international legal instrument to which the United Kingdom and 195 other World Health Organization (WHO) Member States are party. The regulations are a key part of the global health security system to prevent, protect against, control, and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease.
At the WHO World Health Assembly (WHA) in May 2022, Member States including the UK agreed a process to negotiate and agree targeted amendments to the regulations and adopted five process-related amendments.
These amendments shorten the timeframes for future amendments to the regulations to come into force, namely 12 months with the possibility to extend up to 24 months, rather than 24 months, and for Member States to reject or reserve on them for 10 months rather than 18 months.
These amendments apply only to future Member State-agreed amendments to the regulations. The UK supports the amendments as they aim to improve the timeliness of Member States’ implementation of and compliance with the regulations, which helps to better protect the UK from future public health events including pandemics.
The 75th WHA also agreed the process for negotiating further targeted amendments to the regulations. Member States could submit proposed amendments for consideration and a Working Group (WGIHR), consisting of all Regulation State Parties, including the UK, through which the proposed amendments would be negotiated and agreed.
The Government continues to engage in the Member State-led WGIHR negotiation process, working to secure the best outcomes for the UK, as a means of strengthening preparedness for and response to future global health emergencies. Our priorities for the more than 300 proposed amendments continue to include increasing compliance with the regulations, improving transparency, and speeding up timeliness of reporting. No further amendments have been agreed yet. Member States agreed to submit a package of agreed amendments to the WHA in May 2024.
Amendments to the regulations must be adopted by Member States at the WHA for them to come into force as a matter of international law. A 10-month opt-out period for the more than 300 amendments will commence only if and when the amendments have been adopted by the WHA.
The Government has a strong commitment and duty to implement its international obligations. In addition, throughout negotiations, the UK has been and will continue to be clear that we would not agree any amendments that would cede sovereignty to the WHO, including in relation to making domestic decisions on national measures concerning public health, such as, domestic immunisation programme rollouts and other similar measures.
A Westminster Hall debate on the regulation amendments will be held on 18 December 2023. Any new or amended domestic legislation necessary to reflect new international obligations under the regulations would be made through the applicable parliamentary process. In all circumstances, the sovereignty of the UK Parliament would remain unchanged.
Asked by: Lord Hannan of Kingsclere (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the amendment to Article 59 of the World Health Organisation's International Health Regulations, adopted on 22 May 2022 by the World Health Assembly, and for which the opt-out period, available to each country separately, expires on 1 December.
Answered by Lord Markham - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)
The International Health Regulations (2005) are an existing international legal instrument to which the United Kingdom and 195 other World Health Organization (WHO) Member States are party. The regulations are a key part of the global health security system to prevent, protect against, control, and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease.
At the WHO World Health Assembly (WHA) in May 2022, Member States including the UK agreed a process to negotiate and agree targeted amendments to the regulations and adopted five process-related amendments.
These amendments shorten the timeframes for future amendments to the regulations to come into force, namely 12 months with the possibility to extend up to 24 months, rather than 24 months, and for Member States to reject or reserve on them for 10 months rather than 18 months.
These amendments apply only to future Member State-agreed amendments to the regulations. The UK supports the amendments as they aim to improve the timeliness of Member States’ implementation of and compliance with the regulations, which helps to better protect the UK from future public health events including pandemics.
The 75th WHA also agreed the process for negotiating further targeted amendments to the regulations. Member States could submit proposed amendments for consideration and a Working Group (WGIHR), consisting of all Regulation State Parties, including the UK, through which the proposed amendments would be negotiated and agreed.
The Government continues to engage in the Member State-led WGIHR negotiation process, working to secure the best outcomes for the UK, as a means of strengthening preparedness for and response to future global health emergencies. Our priorities for the more than 300 proposed amendments continue to include increasing compliance with the regulations, improving transparency, and speeding up timeliness of reporting. No further amendments have been agreed yet. Member States agreed to submit a package of agreed amendments to the WHA in May 2024.
Amendments to the regulations must be adopted by Member States at the WHA for them to come into force as a matter of international law. A 10-month opt-out period for the more than 300 amendments will commence only if and when the amendments have been adopted by the WHA.
The Government has a strong commitment and duty to implement its international obligations. In addition, throughout negotiations, the UK has been and will continue to be clear that we would not agree any amendments that would cede sovereignty to the WHO, including in relation to making domestic decisions on national measures concerning public health, such as, domestic immunisation programme rollouts and other similar measures.
A Westminster Hall debate on the regulation amendments will be held on 18 December 2023. Any new or amended domestic legislation necessary to reflect new international obligations under the regulations would be made through the applicable parliamentary process. In all circumstances, the sovereignty of the UK Parliament would remain unchanged.
Asked by: Lord Hannan of Kingsclere (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Department for Transport:
To ask His Majesty's Government on what grounds direct flights between the UK and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) are currently prohibited whilst flights to Taiwan are permitted; and what plans they have, if any, to review these in order to facilitate direct flights from the UK to the TRNC.
Answered by Baroness Vere of Norbiton
The Government recognises the inconvenience caused to passengers by the situation regarding air travel from the north of Cyprus to the UK. Under the Chicago Convention, only the Republic of Cyprus may designate Ercan airport as an international customs airport and grant permission for flights to operate from within its territory. It has not done so. As such, those travelling from Ercan airport to Turkey and then onwards to the UK do so on two distinctly separate flights. To do otherwise would be contrary to the UK’s obligations under the Chicago Convention.
This means that no direct air services between the north of Cyprus and the UK can take place. Ultimately, a just and lasting settlement on the island is the best chance of resolving these complex issues. The UK’s commitment to helping the sides achieve this remains unwavering.
It is not relevant to compare Taiwan and the north of Cyprus given that the Chinese authorities have designated a number of airports in Taiwan as international customs airports.
Asked by: Lord Hannan of Kingsclere (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they intend to begin directly importing Turkish Cypriot products, including fresh produce, to the UK from the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.
Answered by Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon
In accordance with the rest of the international community, with the sole exception of Turkey, the UK does not recognise the self-declared "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" as an independent state. Several UN Security Council Resolutions and other multilateral agreements also limit links between UK and the north. The UK has no intention to begin directly importing products. We continue to believe that a just and lasting settlement in Cyprus is the best means of resolving the difficulties caused by the division of the island.