All 3 Debates between Lord Greenhalgh and Baroness Jolly

Shared Prosperity Fund

Debate between Lord Greenhalgh and Baroness Jolly
Thursday 24th March 2022

(2 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Greenhalgh Portrait Lord Greenhalgh (Con)
- Hansard - -

I am sorry, I did not hear the question. But Yorkshire is a very important place as well.

Baroness Jolly Portrait Baroness Jolly (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, Cornwall was in receipt of considerable EU funding. Can the noble Lord confirm that Cornwall is still in the mix for shared prosperity funding?

Lord Greenhalgh Portrait Lord Greenhalgh (Con)
- Hansard - -

Cornwall is incredibly important—with its own language, even—and we want to make sure that we level up within regions and all parts of the country. We recognise the need to deal with some of the real rural deprivation that exists in Cornwall.

Building Safety Bill

Debate between Lord Greenhalgh and Baroness Jolly
Lord Greenhalgh Portrait Lord Greenhalgh (Con)
- Hansard - -

Effectively, the Building Act 1984 has various approved documents, and Approved Document K would be the relevant document to update, which would then set that standard in building regulations. As the noble Baroness, Lady Hayman, has pointed out, when you build new-build homes, you have to build to those regulations. Does that help the noble Baroness understand what I said? I am sorry I am so unclear; I will do better next time.

Baroness Jolly Portrait Baroness Jolly (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, this has been a really fascinating debate. We have a listening Minister, and it looks as if we have a good outcome. I am sure he will carry on listening and, if he does not listen, I am sure we will carry on trying to talk to him to make sure we get what we would like. He said he has met the RoSPA CEO, and he is very insistent and will not take no for an answer. I look forward to pressing this further with the Minister in due course.

Wales: Replacement Funding

Debate between Lord Greenhalgh and Baroness Jolly
Wednesday 3rd March 2021

(3 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Greenhalgh Portrait Lord Greenhalgh (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I underpin the commitment to collaborate very closely with the devolved Administrations. That is why they will be an important part of the governance structure of this new fund. The new fund gives us opportunities to improve on the funding approach used by the EU structural fund, not least because there are now only two layers of government that need to work closely together.

Baroness Jolly Portrait Baroness Jolly (LD) [V]
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the Minister explain how EU funding for Cornwall will be replaced, given that Cornwall would have received around £600 million over the next seven years? Cornwall is still some way from being as prosperous as our south-west neighbours. When does the Minister expect the shared prosperity fund to be designed and funds made available for growth and investment?

Lord Greenhalgh Portrait Lord Greenhalgh (Con)
- Hansard - -

What applies to Cornwall will apply to other areas. Further details on the operation of the fund will be set out in the UK-wide investment framework for the UK shared prosperity fund that will be published in 2021. The funding profile for the UK shared prosperity fund will form part of the next spending review.