Debates between Lord Geddes and Baroness Kramer during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Passenger and Goods Vehicles (Recording Equipment) (Downloading of Data) Regulations 2015

Debate between Lord Geddes and Baroness Kramer
Tuesday 10th February 2015

(9 years, 9 months ago)

Grand Committee
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Kramer Portrait Baroness Kramer
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I shall start by responding to the questions asked about the consultation—there may be some that I cannot cover because I do not have sufficient information at the moment, in which case we will be glad to write. The respondents were hauliers, Unite, traffic commissioners, ACPO, the police and tachograph analysis companies. That is quite a wide range across the industry.

The noble Lord asked about the DVSA. Obviously, we followed up its response to the consultation, and from those discussions our understanding is that it believes its enforcement powers, which enable it to access this information at any time, are the important measure which supports its enforcement activity. Therefore we are comfortable that we are not creating additional problems here for the DVSA. Indeed, the noble Lord will know—and this goes back to the whole question of safety which he discussed—that, increasingly, the whole approach to enforcement has been intelligence-led. That has always been true, but it has become even more so. He will be aware of the London task force, which I believe started its work in October 2013. That is a combined effort by the DVSA, Transport for London, the department and the Met to use a targeted approach, and it has been very successful in London by, again, using intelligence, so that the knowledge of the operators to helps drive the enforcement process, rather than simply using a random process which might have been more prevalent in the past.

Lord Geddes Portrait The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Geddes) (Con)
- Hansard - -

A Division has been called in the Chamber. The Grand Committee stands adjourned.