Information between 8th October 2025 - 7th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Framlingham voted No - against a party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 163 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 194 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 164 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 262 Noes - 157 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 167 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 160 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 113 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 120 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 189 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 174 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 190 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 159 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 141 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 144 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 200 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 194 |
| Written Answers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration: Costs
Asked by: Lord Framlingham (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 16th October 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what were the running costs of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration in the first full year of operation following its establishment; what were the annual running costs for the latest year for which figures are available; and what has been the total cost since its inception. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government does not hold information on the running costs of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration which was established in 1967 and was superseded by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) in 1973. Information on the running costs of the PHSO are set out in its published annual reports and accounts. The running costs for the years for which the PHSO holds information are as follows:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ombudsman
Asked by: Lord Framlingham (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 20th October 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government how many ombudsman bodies exist in the United Kingdom; and who is responsible for their funding. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Cabinet Office is responsible for a subset of public bodies administratively classified as Arm's-Length Bodies, which include Executive Agencies, Non-Departmental Public Bodies, and Non-Ministerial Departments.
There is no statutory definition of "ombudsman" in government, and bodies with varying functions can be labelled as ombudsman
Data on which ALBs are ombudsman bodies, or how they are funded, is not held centrally.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Compulsory Purchase: Prices
Asked by: Lord Framlingham (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 22nd October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the reply by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 17 September (HL Deb col 2288) that there are provisions for paying a fair price for compulsory purchases, what are those provisions. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) I refer the noble Lord to the answer given to his Question UIN HL10400 on 23 September 2025. In addition to the open market value of the acquired land in the absence of the scheme, owners and tenants are entitled to loss payment compensation for the distress and inconvenience of having to move from their property at a time not of their choosing and to claim compensation for disturbance (i.e. losses unconnected to the value of property such as professional fees). |