Lord Framlingham Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Framlingham

Information between 10th June 2025 - 28th September 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 191 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 162
22 Jul 2025 - Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 41 Conservative Aye votes vs 100 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 267
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 173 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 138
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 143


Speeches
Lord Framlingham speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill
Lord Framlingham contributed 2 speeches (134 words)
Committee stage part two
Wednesday 17th September 2025 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Lord Framlingham speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill
Lord Framlingham contributed 1 speech (30 words)
Committee stage
Thursday 4th September 2025 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Lord Framlingham speeches from: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
Lord Framlingham contributed 1 speech (88 words)
Committee stage
Thursday 26th June 2025 - Lords Chamber
Home Office


Written Answers
High Speed 2 Line: Compulsory Purchase
Asked by: Lord Framlingham (Conservative - Life peer)
Friday 20th June 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many houses have been compulsorily purchased along the route of HS2, and how many have been demolished.

Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport)

HS2 Ltd does not categorise properties by type - i.e. ‘houses’ - as a property can have mixed usage. For example, a farm can be (or have within it properties which are) residential, commercial, and/or agricultural, and similarly, a pub can be (and often is) both residential and commercial.

HS2 Ltd does record the number of property compensation claims made, however, the quantity of claims does not indicate how many houses (or other properties) have been acquired because property arrangements are highly varied.

HS2 Ltd does record the amount of land that has been acquired. To date, approximately 56km2 of land has been acquired for Phases One and 2a through compulsory purchase. No land or properties have been compulsory purchased along the route of Phase 2b as HS2 Ltd has never had the legal powers to do so.

In respect to demolitions, HS2 records show that 332 structures have been or were scheduled to be demolished along the route of HS2. It should be noted that this figure is not limited to properties but includes other structures such as substations and bridges.

High Speed 2 Line: Farms
Asked by: Lord Framlingham (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 24th June 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many farms have lost land to, or been affected by, the route of HS2.

Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport)

HS2 records show 346 farms were included within both Acts of Parliament. These Farms will be impacted to varying degrees, including through loss of land due to acquisition or other effects, such as impacts to access or impacts from noise.

Forestry: Training
Asked by: Lord Framlingham (Conservative - Life peer)
Wednesday 18th June 2025

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government why they closed the Forestry and Arboriculture Training Fund; and what plans they have to ensure that there are enough trained tree surgeons and arborists to meet demand and to deal with the number of urban trees planted in the past 50 years.

Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

The Government recognises forestry skills as vital for achieving environmental targets, enhancing biodiversity, and supporting the economy through sustainable woodland management and green job creation. The Government is facing a very challenging wider fiscal context. This has meant that Defra has had to make difficult decisions about funding which has included not to continue with the Forestry and Arboriculture Training Fund in 2025/26. The Forestry Commission is collecting feedback from course attendees and will be working with key stakeholders throughout 2025/26 to deliver the Forestry Sector Skills Plan. There are new technical, higher technical and professional education routes being developed into the forestry sector, and work is underway to improve links with allied sectors such as arboriculture, agriculture and horticulture.

High Speed 2 Line: Compulsory Purchase
Asked by: Lord Framlingham (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 16th June 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether owners of property purchased for the route of HS2 were required to enter non-disclosure agreements as a condition for receiving compensation, if so why, and who authorised this.

Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport)

It is not a condition of receiving compensation for property purchased on the HS2 route that the owner must enter into a non-disclosure agreement.

High Speed 2 Line
Asked by: Lord Framlingham (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 17th June 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask His Majesty's Government why and when they authorised the use of cost-plus instead of fixed-price contracts for payment of contractors on HS2; what consultations they held prior to the change; and who authorised that change.

Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport)

This government has been clear that the position on HS2 is totally unacceptable for passengers and taxpayers. It is acknowledged by this government and new CEO Mark Wild that the past contractual performance of our delivery partners has failed to meet cost and schedule expectations.

We have taken action to grip the project and tasked Mark Wild to reset the project, including reforming and resetting the relationship with the supply chain, and to deliver Phase 1 safely and at the lowest reasonable cost.

Throughout the development of the HS2 programme there has been engagement with industry, and input sought from wider government stakeholders, to seek to ensure that the commercial approaches and contracts adopted are appropriate for the individual assets being delivered. Consequently, a variety of different contract forms are in use across the HS2 programme including both fixed price and defined cost contracts (similar to cost plus), as well as other contract forms. For example, HS2 Ltd’s Main Works Civils Contracts (MWCC) are defined cost, incentivised, two-stage design and build contracts based on the NEC 3 Option C target cost contract model. Such NEC contracts are in common usage throughout the UK construction industry as they provide flexibility and encourage a collaborative approach.

Notice to Proceed was granted on HS2 Ltd’s Phase One Main Works Contracts in 2020. At that time there was no prospect of determining a reliable fixed price, nor getting the supply chain to agree to such a model given the residual risk. Therefore fixed price contracts were not viewed as viable.

As with all procurement activity on HS2, these contracts were let in line with HS2 Ltd’s governance and assurance requirements which conform with UK procurement law.

Undocumented Migrants: English Channel
Asked by: Lord Framlingham (Conservative - Life peer)
Friday 12th September 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they reimburse the Royal National Lifeboat Institution for assistance with boats bringing migrants across the Channel; and, if so, what is the basis for that reimbursement; and what is the total cost to date.

Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport)

HM Government does not reimburse the Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI) for any Search and Rescue (SAR) activity and does not differentiate the SAR response to small boats crossing the Channel from any other type of SAR.

Land: Compulsory Purchase
Asked by: Lord Framlingham (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 23rd September 2025

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to change the rules on the compulsory purchase of land for infrastructure projects such as HS2 so that farmers receive 100 per cent of the land value rather than 90 per cent.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The overriding principle of compulsory purchase compensation is ‘equivalence’, so that landowners are left neither better nor worse off (at least in monetary terms) as a result of their land being compulsorily acquired.

Compulsory purchase compensation is based on the open market value of the land acquired in the absence of the scheme, for example, regeneration project or railway line, underlying the compulsory purchase. This is known as the “no scheme principle”. Under the no-scheme principle, any increases or decreases in the value of the land attributable to the compulsory purchase scheme, or the prospect of the scheme, are disregarded when assessing compensation for the value of land acquired. The Government has no plans to change this principle.




Lord Framlingham mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

4 Sep 2025, 4:53 p.m. - House of Lords
"community. My noble friend Lord Framlingham will be aware of the legal judgements that happened in "
Baroness Coffey (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript
17 Sep 2025, 4:46 p.m. - House of Lords
"Lord Framlingham, we have a group on "
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript


Parliamentary Debates
Planning and Infrastructure Bill
222 speeches (48,096 words)
Committee stage part two
Wednesday 17th September 2025 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Mentions:
1: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) Let me reassure the noble Lord, Lord Framlingham, that we have a whole group on CPO powers, group 9, - Link to Speech

Planning and Infrastructure Bill
170 speeches (52,648 words)
Committee stage
Thursday 4th September 2025 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Mentions:
1: Baroness Coffey (Con - Life peer) My noble friend Lord Framlingham will be aware of the legal judgments of the past few years where some - Link to Speech

Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
105 speeches (29,993 words)
Committee stage
Thursday 26th June 2025 - Lords Chamber
Home Office
Mentions:
1: Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab - Life peer) I say in response to the noble Lord, Lord Framlingham, that there is a great sense of urgency from this - Link to Speech
2: Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab - Life peer) the step change in the UK’s approach to border security—the very point that the noble Lord, Lord Framlingham - Link to Speech



APPG Publications

Scientific APPG
Wednesday 11th June 2025


Document: P&SC Annual Report 2023

Found: Baroness Brown of Cambridge Lord Clement-Jones Lord Craig of Radley Lord Deben Lord Fox Lord Framlingham

Scientific APPG
Wednesday 11th June 2025


Document: P&SC Annual Report 2022

Found: Andrews Lord Boswell of Aynho Lord Clement-Jones Lord Craig of Radley Lord Deben Lord Fox Lord Framlingham

Scientific APPG
Wednesday 11th June 2025


Document: P&SC Annual Report 2021

Found: Boswell of Aynho Lord Broers Lord Clement-Jones Lord Craig of Radley Lord Deben Lord Fox Lord Framlingham

Scientific APPG
Wednesday 11th June 2025


Document: P&SC Annual Report 2020

Found: Broers Lord Clement-Jones Lord Craig of Radley Lord Davies of Coity Lord Deben Lord Fox Lord Framlingham

Scientific APPG
Wednesday 11th June 2025


Document: P&SC Annual Report 2019

Found: Boswell of Aynho Lord Broers Lord Clement-Jones Lord Craig of Radley Lord Deben Lord Fox Lord Framlingham