Lord Framlingham Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Framlingham

Information between 8th October 2025 - 7th November 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 163 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 194
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 164
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 262 Noes - 157
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 167 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 160
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 113
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 120
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 189 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 153
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 174 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 190 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 159
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 141
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 147 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 144
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 149 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 200
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Framlingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 194


Written Answers
Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration: Costs
Asked by: Lord Framlingham (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 16th October 2025

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what were the running costs of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration in the first full year of operation following its establishment; what were the annual running costs for the latest year for which figures are available; and what has been the total cost since its inception.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Government does not hold information on the running costs of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration which was established in 1967 and was superseded by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) in 1973. Information on the running costs of the PHSO are set out in its published annual reports and accounts. The running costs for the years for which the PHSO holds information are as follows:

Year:

Running Costs (£ million):

2004-2005

19,203

2005-2006

22,263

2006-2007

22,679

2007-2008

24,252

2008-2009

26,056

2009-2010

33,211

2010-2011

33,038

2011-2012

33,039

2012-2013

33,204

2013-2014

34,793

2014-2015

36,809

2015-2016

30,492

2016-2017

34,646

2017-2018

29,427

2018-2019

27,201

2019-2020

29,197

2020-2021

29,486

2021-2022

32,499

2022-2023

40,543

2023-2024

42,032

2024-2025

41,513

Ombudsman
Asked by: Lord Framlingham (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 20th October 2025

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many ombudsman bodies exist in the United Kingdom; and who is responsible for their funding.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Cabinet Office is responsible for a subset of public bodies administratively classified as Arm's-Length Bodies, which include Executive Agencies, Non-Departmental Public Bodies, and Non-Ministerial Departments.

There is no statutory definition of "ombudsman" in government, and bodies with varying functions can be labelled as ombudsman

Data on which ALBs are ombudsman bodies, or how they are funded, is not held centrally.

Compulsory Purchase: Prices
Asked by: Lord Framlingham (Conservative - Life peer)
Wednesday 22nd October 2025

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the reply by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 17 September (HL Deb col 2288) that there are provisions for paying a fair price for compulsory purchases, what are those provisions.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

I refer the noble Lord to the answer given to his Question UIN HL10400 on 23 September 2025. In addition to the open market value of the acquired land in the absence of the scheme, owners and tenants are entitled to loss payment compensation for the distress and inconvenience of having to move from their property at a time not of their choosing and to claim compensation for disturbance (i.e. losses unconnected to the value of property such as professional fees).