Nutrition (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Thursday 21st March 2019

(5 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
My noble friend also asked why infant formula is not covered by the statutory instrument. I alluded to that in my opening remarks and said that the Government will work very closely with the industry. It will not be in place if we leave on the date that was envisaged, but we will of course mirror any future regulations as they come into play.
Lord Fox Portrait Lord Fox (LD)
- Hansard - -

On a point of order, when the noble Baroness turns away from the microphone, we cannot hear what she is saying.

Baroness Manzoor Portrait Baroness Manzoor
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My apologies to the noble Lord. I was saying on infant formula, as I mentioned in my opening remarks, that if there are any changes, we will continue to mirror the regulations and, if there are any new initiatives, we will introduce new regulations in the usual way.

The noble Lord, Lord Rennard, and my noble friend Lady McIntosh also asked whether we would continue to be a member of EFSA. As I said, the nature of the UK’s future relationship with EFSA will be subject to negotiation with the EU. However, this SI provides for the appropriate expert committee or authority to assume EFSA’s function in a no-deal scenario, and this will guarantee certainty for business.

I hope that that answers most of the questions that noble Lords asked. I conclude by again reassuring all stakeholders that it is our policy intention to mirror the existing regulations as closely as possible. Guidance will be published shortly, and industry should be further reassured that stakeholders who we have consulted believe it covers all necessary aspects of the legislation and is fit for purpose from exit day. I commend the Motion.