(3 years, 11 months ago)
Lords ChamberThe noble Baroness makes a valid point, and I would be interested to see the outcome of that analysis. In working together, we can help alleviate some of the problems older people are facing in this area.
My Lords, the time allowed for this Question has elapsed. We now come to the fourth Oral Question.
(3 years, 12 months ago)
Lords ChamberI absolutely recognise the noble Baroness’s point about the barriers to accessing services, which are many and varied. I also acknowledge that in passing the Domestic Abuse Bill we will be complying with the Istanbul convention.
My Lords, the time allowed for this Question has elapsed. We now come to the fourth Oral Question.
(4 years ago)
Lords ChamberWith apologies, I think I will move on. I call the noble Baroness, Lady D’Souza.
My Lords, hate speech that results in criminal actions such as incitement to violence is to be both deplored and subject to legislation. That said, I am concerned that one of our most precious democratic freedoms—freedom of expression—might be hampered if this is widely applied to include any offensive or misogynistic speech. The distinction between unpleasant, even hateful, speech and criminal incitement is often determined by the context in which it occurs. Does the Minister agree that each hate speech incident should be considered on a case-by-case basis rather than by means of broad legal sanctions?
I am aware that such an amendment may come forward to your Lordships’ House; the debate on it will be very interesting and thoughtful, as debates on such amendments always are. I look forward to discussing it with the noble Baroness before the Domestic Abuse Bill comes to your Lordships’ House.
My Lords, all supplementary questions have been asked. We will now move on to the next Oral Question.
(4 years ago)
Lords ChamberAs a matter of course during the Covid pandemic, if someone is a victim of domestic violence, they are effectively supported as such first and foremost, before any other considerations are taken into account. Certainly, “no recourse to public funds” change of conditions grants have been 89% successful. I do not take away from what the noble Lord says at all, because he is asking whether we can help these people as victims of domestic violence first and foremost.
My Lords, the time allowed for this Question has elapsed and it brings Question Time to an end.
(4 years ago)
Lords ChamberWhat is important is that local providers of accommodation-based services are the people who are best placed to do the risk assessment when people are going into their accommodation. It has become a very volatile conversation and I would be very pleased, at a slow time, to have a conversation with the noble Lord on this issue.
My Lords, the time allowed for this Question has elapsed.
(4 years, 1 month ago)
Lords ChamberOn Report, I promised to meet with noble Lords. I called it “task and finish”, but I am still thinking of the best way to set that up. And yes, I would like to report some of the findings of that discussion to your Lordships’ House.
My Lords, the time allowed for this Question has elapsed. We now come to the third Oral Question.
(4 years, 1 month ago)
Lords ChamberMy Lords, I do not think that anyone could disagree with the noble Lord’s point. I have said that these things are routinely tested. I will find the exact date when they were last tested. The DSTL does not believe that the Mail on Sunday tests demonstrate a weakness in the equipment that it has approved.
(4 years, 2 months ago)
Lords ChamberI will respond to the areas raised by the noble Viscount that pertain to the Home Office and are linked to DCMS. Clearly, in January, the government restrictions on the use of Huawei equipment introduced the restrictions in 5G and FTTP networks. We expect the decision to be brought into law by the forthcoming telecoms security Bill.
I call Lord Desai. No? We will move on. I call the noble Lord, Lord Paddick.
My Lords, this new emergency service network will operate on old 4G technology, and current estimates are that it will cost £33,000 per user. We learned from the King’s Cross fire and the 7/7 terrorist attacks the importance of this network working on the London Underground but, to date, it does not—even though my own iPhone does. How and when will this be resolved?
What is important with the infrastructure to which the Huawei systems relate is where security lies in terms of national security and, going forward, the security of people’s devices and that sort of thing.
My Lords, all supplementary questions have been asked, and we now move to the next Question.
(4 years, 2 months ago)
Lords ChamberI cannot stand at the Dispatch Box and say that there is clear evidence. I am saying here that the Government are doing a number of things across a number of areas to make it easier for people to come forward, to be listened to, and for evidence to be gathered in a proportionate and non-intrusive way. Digital extraction is one part of that, but we would not want that to impede a woman’s—or man’s—willingness to come forward.
My Lords, the time allowed for this Question has elapsed, and that brings Question Time to an end.
(4 years, 3 months ago)
Lords ChamberI am not sure that there is a question to answer. I agree with my noble friend, and the reason that she got in is because the Minister was so quick at answering the questions.
I congratulate them both. We now come to the fourth Oral Question, from the noble Lord, Lord Balfe.