Lord Foulkes of Cumnock

Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Foulkes of Cumnock

Information between 17th April 2026 - 27th May 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

Division Votes
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 158
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 180
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 150
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 148
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 144
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 169
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 126 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 138
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 125 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 143
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 146
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 197 Noes - 144
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 145
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 152 Noes - 207
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 58 Noes - 138
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 145
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 144
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 145
27 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 5 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 165
28 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 160 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 181

Speeches
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock speeches from: Higher Earners: Emigration Lord Foulkes of Cumnock contributed 1 speech (30 words) Thursday 21st May 2026 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock speeches from: 2026 FIFA World Cup: Replica Kit Pricing Lord Foulkes of Cumnock contributed 1 speech (65 words) Wednesday 20th May 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock speeches from: Defence, Security and Resilience Bank Lord Foulkes of Cumnock contributed 1 speech (60 words) Tuesday 19th May 2026 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock speeches from: Lord Mandelson: Government Response to Humble Address Lord Foulkes of Cumnock contributed 1 speech (49 words) Tuesday 19th May 2026 - Lords Chamber Cabinet Office

Written Answers
Human Trafficking Asked by: Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour - Life peer) Friday 22nd May 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hanson of Flint on 14 April (HL14589), what assessment they have made of reporting by the BBC on 24 April that Jeffrey Epstein paid for at least five women to study in London; and whether they will now review their assessment that there is "no evidence" of English-language course enrolment being misused for trafficking. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) The Home Office monitors trafficking and exploitation risks across the immigration system and identifies and supports potential victims, including through the National Referral Mechanism. There is no evidence indicating systemic misuse of English‑language course enrolment for trafficking or exploitation purposes.

Written Answers

Human Trafficking
Asked by: Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour - Life peer)
Friday 22nd May 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hanson of Flint on 14 April (HL14589), what assessment they have made of reporting by the BBC on 24 April that Jeffrey Epstein paid for at least five women to study in London; and whether they will now review their assessment that there is "no evidence" of English-language course enrolment being misused for trafficking.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Home Office monitors trafficking and exploitation risks across the immigration system and identifies and supports potential victims, including through the National Referral Mechanism.

There is no evidence indicating systemic misuse of English‑language course enrolment for trafficking or exploitation purposes.