2 Lord Forbes of Newcastle debates involving HM Treasury

Further Education Colleges: Recovery of VAT

Lord Forbes of Newcastle Excerpts
Tuesday 9th June 2026

(6 days ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Asked by
Lord Forbes of Newcastle Portrait Lord Forbes of Newcastle
- View Speech - Hansard - -

To ask His Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the impact on further education colleges of their inability to recover VAT on expenditure; and what plans they have, if any, to address this disparity to create equality with other publicly funded education providers.

Lord Forbes of Newcastle Portrait Lord Forbes of Newcastle (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I beg leave to ask the Question standing in my name on the Order Paper. In doing so, I draw attention to my role as president of Capital City College Group.

Lord Livermore Portrait The Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Lord Livermore) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, further education colleges are publicly funded and provide free education. No VAT is charged on these services, meaning colleges cannot recover VAT on their costs. Further education colleges are currently outside the scope of VAT refund schemes that allow some public bodies, such as schools maintained by local authorities, to recover their VAT. The Government are continuing to look into the VAT position of these colleges.

Lord Forbes of Newcastle Portrait Lord Forbes of Newcastle (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I thank my noble friend the Minister for that response. As he correctly identifies, since 2011, FE colleges, unlike councils, academies and almost all other public sector organisations, have been unable to reclaim VAT costs from the Government’s refund scheme. LSE research estimates this to be a loss to the sector of £200 million a year. This puts college students at a funding disadvantage compared to their peers in state-funded schools and reduces resources for courses in government priority areas such as construction, engineering, digital and health. Given that colleges deliver disproportionately to young people from more disadvantaged backgrounds, and in the context of the current national crisis of young people not in education, employment or training, will the Government commit to reviewing this funding inequity for the FE sector as part of their cross-departmental response to the Milburn review?

Lord Livermore Portrait Lord Livermore (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am grateful to my noble friend for his question. As I have said, the Government are continuing to look into the VAT position of these colleges. Of course, admitting further education colleges to a VAT refund scheme would be a change in tax policy. As my noble friend knows, the Chancellor makes decisions on tax policy at fiscal events in the context of the overall public finances. I agree with my noble friend about the importance of FE colleges. That is why we are investing in FE colleges: £1.7 billion to support them to maintain their estates; £375 million to expand capacity for post-16 education; £590 million to support priorities such as recruitment and retention; and £295 million into 29 technical excellence colleges to support key sectors for growth including construction, engineering and manufacturing.

Business Rates

Lord Forbes of Newcastle Excerpts
Thursday 29th January 2026

(4 months, 2 weeks ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Livermore Portrait Lord Livermore (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am very happy to tell the noble Lord what my least favourite policy of the previous Government was, and that was Brexit.

Lord Forbes of Newcastle Portrait Lord Forbes of Newcastle (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, does my noble friend the Minister agree with me about the importance of certainty and security for businesses in the payment of business rates in particular? While local authority funding is predicated on the retention of business rates at a local level, as well as council tax rates, there is regional variation in the deployment of the collection of those rates, based on differential bandings according to the nature of properties in those areas. Will he consider the challenge that many small businesses face in having to pay business rates, compared to the longevity of property owners? Will he consider looking at the payment of business rates in future by business owners rather than businesses themselves as a way of smoothing out some of these challenges?

Lord Livermore Portrait Lord Livermore (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am grateful to my noble friend for that question, which obviously comes from a position of deep expertise in this matter. I am more than happy to look at all the issues he raises and take them back to my Treasury colleagues to discuss them further.