Railways: Passenger Demand Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Transport

Railways: Passenger Demand

Lord Faulkner of Worcester Excerpts
Thursday 31st October 2013

(11 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Asked by
Lord Faulkner of Worcester Portrait Lord Faulkner of Worcester
- Hansard - -



To ask Her Majesty’s Government what estimates they have made of the cost of upgrading the West Coast and East Coast main railway lines to bring them up to the standard likely to be required to meet passenger demand after 2020.

Baroness Kramer Portrait The Minister of State, Department for Transport (Baroness Kramer) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the only viable option for solving problems on the west and east coast main lines beyond 2020 is HS2. The Government have looked at alternatives, including upgrading these routes. The lead alternative looks to enhance all three existing north-south main lines at a cost of £19.2 billion, £2.5 billion of which is required for the west coast and £11.5 billion for the east coast. None of these alternatives delivers the scale of benefits of HS2.

Lord Faulkner of Worcester Portrait Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I welcome the Minister to the Dispatch Box for her first Oral Question and warmly congratulate her on that Answer. With the number of people travelling by train now higher than at any time in the history of Britain’s railways, with growth over the past five years running at 5%, does she agree with Network Rail’s assessment that a make-do-and-mend approach to the main lines built by our Victorian ancestors would require 2,770 weekend closures, endless bus substitutions and increased journey times over 14 years, and do little for economic growth for our great cities outside London?