Information between 28th October 2025 - 27th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Thursday 13th November 2025 Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Conservative - Life peer) Debate - Main Chamber Subject: Government’s economic and taxation policies on jobs, growth and prosperity. View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 189 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 174 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 190 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 159 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 141 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 118 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 139 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 137 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 144 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 200 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 194 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 164 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 227 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 178 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 179 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 185 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 198 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 195 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 135 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 198 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 199 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 193 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 184 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 244 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell speeches from: Economic and Taxation Policies: Jobs, Growth and Prosperity
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell contributed 4 speeches (2,513 words) Thursday 13th November 2025 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Apprentices: Further Education
Asked by: Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 28th October 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask His Majesty's Government what support they are providing for employer-college apprenticeship collaborations and how they plan to extend this support. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) Skills is a devolved matter, and the response outlines the information for England only. The government provides a range of support to help employers and training providers, including colleges, to offer apprenticeships. Government pays 100% of apprentice training costs for employers who do not pay the levy when they take on apprentices aged 16-21, and apprentices aged 22-24 who have an Education, Health and Care Plan or have been, or are, in local authority care. For all other apprentices, government pays 95% of training costs for employers that don’t pay the levy. The government pays £1,000 to both employers and providers for apprentices aged 16-18, and for apprentices aged 19-24 who have an Education, Health and Care Plan or have been, or are, in local authority care. In August, the government launched the first new foundation apprenticeships which are underpinned by an employer incentive payment of £2,000. This will be paid in three instalments, the first two spread across the foundation apprenticeship, with the final payment made when an apprentice progresses onto their next apprenticeship. In addition, the government continues to simplify the apprenticeship system to make it easier for employers and providers to focus on delivering high-quality training. This includes reforms to the apprenticeship payment system which will cut red tape by stopping the need for providers to log the same data multiple times, and the introduction of a one click employer onboarding process which allows providers to complete the setup for an employer, who can then approve it in a single step. |
|
Recruitment: Disadvantaged
Asked by: Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 28th October 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the barriers to local recruitment in areas of greatest deprivation. Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) We recognise the importance of considering the needs of local labour markets in addressing barriers to recruitment. As our Get Britain Working White Paper set out, areas with higher levels of deprivation often have lower levels of educational attainment and there are more working-age adults living with major illness in the most deprived areas (14.6%), which is more than double the rate in the least deprived areas (6.3%).
The Get Britain Working White Paper set out our ambitions to transform employment support and tackle economic inactivity. As part of this, local areas in England are producing Local Get Britain Working Plans to develop a system-wide approach to identifying and addressing local labour market challenges. Further, Trailblazers to test how locally-led responses to tackling economic inactivity and young people not in education, employment and training are being delivered across England and Wales.
Furthermore, our supported employment programme, Connect to Work, has been designed alongside Local Authorities and is being delivered by local areas in England and Wales to help more disabled people, those with health conditions and people with complex barriers to employment help to find sustainable work.
The UK Government will respect devolution settlements and work closely with the Devolved Governments, including the Northern Ireland Executive, to share best practice about how our reforms to reduce economic inactivity are working.
|
|
Productivity
Asked by: Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 4th November 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Baroness Sherlock on 13 October (HL Deb col 12), whether there is academic research to evidence that the Employment Rights Bill will be a driver of productivity; and, if so, what the research shows. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) On Monday 21 October 2024, the Government published the Employment Rights Bill: economic analysis and summary impact assessment. The analysis shows that the Employment Rights Bill could have a small but direct and positive, impact on economic growth. It cites academic evidence linking stronger employment protections to improved productivity and highlights that better job security, wellbeing, and reduced undercutting of good employers may lead to a more productive workforce. This assessment is grounded in the best available evidence developed in consultation with experts, including academics. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
13 Nov 2025, 1:45 p.m. - House of Lords ">> The noble Lord. >> Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell for. >> Securing and introducing this debate, even if its timing in peak " Lord Harper (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Nov 2025, 2:02 p.m. - House of Lords "gains. My Lords, this debate matters. I congratulate my noble friend Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell " Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Nov 2025, 2:12 p.m. - House of Lords "my noble friend Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell for obtaining this debate just 13 days before budget. " Lord Petitgas (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Nov 2025, 2:13 p.m. - House of Lords "revenues. As my noble friend Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell said, more ultra rich people are set to leave the United Kingdom than any other " Lord Swire (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Nov 2025, 2:20 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell for introducing this debate. I welcome the opportunity to have a debate on " Baroness Fall (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Nov 2025, 2:20 p.m. - House of Lords ">> Yes. Here. Yeah. >> We must thank the noble Lord Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell for " Baroness Fall (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Nov 2025, 2:49 p.m. - House of Lords " My Lord, I congratulate Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell for securing this debate. I think it's testament " Lord Wharton of Yarm (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Nov 2025, 2:38 p.m. - House of Lords ">> Lord Knight congratulate my noble friend Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell on securing this important " Lord Frost (Non-affiliated) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Nov 2025, 2:45 p.m. - House of Lords "skill that Margaret Thatcher showed all those years ago. Thank the. Noble Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell " Lord Sikka (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Nov 2025, 2:45 p.m. - House of Lords "Noble Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell for securing this debate and often told story is that Albert Einstein " Lord Sikka (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Economic and Taxation Policies: Jobs, Growth and Prosperity
86 speeches (28,458 words) Thursday 13th November 2025 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury Mentions: 1: Viscount Chandos (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell, for securing and introducing - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Stedman-Scott (Con - Life peer) I congratulate my noble friend Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell on securing it. - Link to Speech 3: Lord Davies of Brixton (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, we must thank the noble Lord, Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell, for introducing this debate. - Link to Speech 4: Lord Sikka (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell, for securing this debate. - Link to Speech 5: Lord Livermore (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell, on securing this debate. - Link to Speech 6: Lord Wharton of Yarm (Con - Life peer) My Lords, I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell, on securing this debate. - Link to Speech |
|
Supporting High Streets
308 speeches (39,385 words) Tuesday 4th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Tom Tugendhat (Con - Tonbridge) Member for Arundel and South Downs (Andrew Griffith), and two Members of the other place, Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Sunday 23rd November 2025
Report - Time to deliver: The Autism Act 2009 and the new autism strategy - Summary and list of conclusions and recommendations Autism Act 2009 Committee Found: Baroness Browning Baroness Pitkeathley Lord Crisp Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Monday 10th November 2025 2:30 p.m. Autism Act 2009 Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |