Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell

Information between 6th April 2024 - 6th May 2024

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 146 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 154
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 164 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 177
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 177 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 192
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 176 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 192
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 186 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 211
22 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 188 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 211
17 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 189 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 195
17 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 193 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 208
16 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 180 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 197
16 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 177 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 192
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 204 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 218
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 208 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 236
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 204 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 227
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 205 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 233
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 166 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 67 Noes - 175
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 191 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 209
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 199 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 238 Noes - 217
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 191 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 208
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 199 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 222 Noes - 222


Written Answers
GCE A-level
Asked by: Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 8th April 2024

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government what are the latest available data on the number and percentage of students who left school after their A-levels to go into work; and what percentage of them received (1) 100 UCAS points or above in their A-levels, and (2) 150 UCAS points or above in their A-levels.

Answered by Baroness Barran - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

The department publishes information on the sustained destinations of students after 16-18 study, broken down by the level at which they studied. The table below gives the latest data on the number and percentage of students who were deemed to be at the end of 16-18 study in 2020/21 (2021 leavers) and their sustained destination in the 2021/22 academic year.


This is for students studying at level 3 and the number and percentage that went on to sustain an employment destination.

The destinations data does not include information on students’ A level results or UCAS points. However, over three quarters of students who studied an approved level 3 qualification completed A Levels.

Sustained employment destinations of level 3 students from state-funded mainstream schools and colleges in England for the 2020/21 cohort of 16-18 leavers.

2021/22 destination year

Number of level 3 students completing 16-18 study

288,726

Number of level 3 students with a sustained employment destination

61,866

Percentage of level 3 students with a sustained employment destination

21.4%

  • Sustained employment destination: in order to count as a sustained destination, the student must have six months of continuous employment activity between October and March in 2021/22.
  • The way the department decides when a student is at the end of 16 to 18 study has changed for the 2020/21 (2021 leavers) and comparisons to previous cohorts should be treated with extreme caution.
  • Total state-funded mainstream schools and colleges covers all state-funded mainstream schools, academies, free schools, city technology colleges, sixth-forms and other further education sector colleges. Excludes alternative provision, special schools, other government department funded colleges and independent schools.
Occupations
Asked by: Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Conservative - Life peer)
Friday 12th April 2024

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government when the Office for National Statistics plans to begin publishing data classifying jobs in the labour market based on the new six-digit Extended Standard Occupational Classification 2020 framework rather than the current four-digit Standard Occupational Classification 2020 framework.

Answered by Baroness Neville-Rolfe - Minister of State (Cabinet Office)

The information requested falls under the remit of the UK Statistics Authority.

Please see the letter attached from the National Statistician and Chief Executive of the UK Statistics Authority.

Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell

House of Lords

London

SW1A 0PW

04 April 2024

Dear Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell,

As National Statistician and Chief Executive of the UK Statistics Authority, I am responding to your Parliamentary Question asking when the Office for National Statistics (ONS) plans to begin publishing data classifying jobs in the labour market based on the new six-digit Extended Standard Occupational Classification 2020 framework rather than the current four-digit Standard Occupational Classification 2020 framework (HL3670).

The ONS collects information on the labour market status of individuals through the Labour Force Survey (LFS), which is a survey of people resident in households in the UK. In addition to their labour market status, working respondents provide a description of their job allowing us to classify their occupation to the appropriate Standard Occupational Classification 2020 (SOC2020) code.

Similarly, the 2021 Census collected information allowing us to identify the labour market status of individuals and classify their occupation in line with SOC2020.

Much of the job information from these sources, collected from respondents, do not contain sufficient detail to give an accurate coding at the six-digit lower-level classification. Consequently, the ONS currently has no plans to publish data at the six-digit SOC2020 level.

Yours sincerely,

Professor Sir Ian Diamond