Information between 27th January 2026 - 8th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
28 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 67 Noes - 191 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 183 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 166 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 180 |
|
4 Feb 2026 - Public Order Act 2023 (Interference With Use or Operation of Key National Infrastructure) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 165 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 62 Noes - 295 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 173 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 251 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 169 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 258 |
|
24 Feb 2026 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 246 |
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 129 Noes - 132 |
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 141 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 145 |
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 52 Noes - 146 |
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 161 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 41 Noes - 181 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 143 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 140 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 142 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 139 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 142 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 71 Noes - 177 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Eatwell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 121 Noes - 145 |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
24 Feb 2026, 4:55 p.m. - House of Lords ">> Lord Eatwell asking what evidence he has for that. I will remember that when I was on the " Lord Rennard (Non-affiliated) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 11th February 2026
Oral Evidence - Professor Kern Alexander Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK - Financial Services Regulation Committee Found: Lord Eatwell: You cannot have know your customer because the stablecoin is like cash. |
|
Wednesday 11th February 2026
Oral Evidence - Professor Simon Gleeson Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK - Financial Services Regulation Committee Found: present: Baroness Noakes (The Chair); Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted; Lord Davies of Brixton; Lord Eatwell |
|
Friday 6th February 2026
Declarations of interest - Financial Services Regulation Committee Declaration of Interests as of 4 February 2026 Financial Services Regulation Committee Found: Lord Eatwell No relevant interests to declare. |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 11th February 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK At 10:00am: Oral evidence Professor Simon Gleeson At 11:00am: Oral evidence Professor Kern Alexander View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 25th February 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK At 10:00am: Oral evidence Elise Soucie Watts - Executive Director at Global Digital Finance At 11:00am: Oral evidence Jana Mackintosh - Managing Director for Payments and Innovation at UK Finance View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 4th March 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK At 10:00am: Oral evidence Tom Duff Gordon - Vice President for International Policy at Coinbase At 11:00am: Oral evidence Adam Jackson - Chief Strategy Officer at Innovate Finance View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 11th March 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK At 10:00am: Oral evidence Sarah Breeden - Deputy Governor at Bank of England Sasha Mills - Executive Director of Financial Market Infrastructure at Bank of England At 11:00am: Oral evidence Matthias Bauer-Langgartner - Head of Policy, Europe, at Chainalysis View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 18th March 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK At 10:00am: Oral evidence Dante Disparte - Chief Strategy Officer and Head of Global Policy & Operations at Circle At 11:00am: Oral evidence Jesse McWaters - Executive Vice President and Head of Global Policy at Mastercard View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 25th March 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
28 Jan 2026
Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK Financial Services Regulation Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions This inquiry will examine the development of, and proposed regulatory response to, stablecoins in the UK. In particular, the inquiry will examine the extent to which stablecoins might disrupt the traditional models of provision of financial services, including for banking and payments services. The inquiry will also assess the potential opportunities and risks that the growth of stablecoins might have on UK’s financial services sector, and whether the Bank of England and FCA’s proposed regulatory frameworks provide measured and proportionate responses to these risks. |