Bank Accounts Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury
Wednesday 19th July 2023

(1 year, 3 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Penn Portrait Baroness Penn (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I agree with the noble Lord on both points. When it comes to assessing whether that has taken place, that is a question for the regulator.

Lord Davies of Brixton Portrait Lord Davies of Brixton (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, I have to express a bit of concern about what I take to be the mood of the House. Will the Minister confirm that a PEP regime is essential, albeit one that is properly operated, and secondly, that if people cannot account properly for their income, it is right and proper for banks to refuse to continue an account?

Baroness Penn Portrait Baroness Penn (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, that is why it is important to distinguish between the PEP regime, which has caused problems for people, and questions about banks’ actions in relation to freedom of speech or political views. It is important, though, in both circumstances, whether you are a PEP or you have expressed any view that is lawfully held, that you have access to bank accounts. In taking forward our work on PEPs in particular, we are mindful of always maintaining our commitment to international standards in this area, and our amendments to the Financial Services and Markets Act do just that.