Lord Cromwell Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Cromwell

Information between 2nd March 2026 - 22nd March 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 13 Crossbench Aye votes vs 11 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 171
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted No and against the House
One of 12 Crossbench No votes vs 15 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 174
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted No and against the House
One of 25 Crossbench No votes vs 22 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 180
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted No and in line with the House
One of 32 Crossbench No votes vs 8 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 75 Noes - 190
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted Aye and against the House
One of 22 Crossbench Aye votes vs 17 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 172
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 14 Crossbench Aye votes vs 19 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 180
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 29 Crossbench Aye votes vs 9 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 221
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted No and against the House
One of 5 Crossbench No votes vs 4 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 153
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted No and against the House
One of 24 Crossbench No votes vs 5 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 177
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted No and against the House
One of 19 Crossbench No votes vs 5 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 171
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 25 Crossbench Aye votes vs 9 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted No and in line with the House
One of 16 Crossbench No votes vs 7 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 163
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted No and in line with the House
One of 20 Crossbench No votes vs 8 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 119 Noes - 191
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 45 Crossbench Aye votes vs 1 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 148
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted No and against the House
One of 20 Crossbench No votes vs 24 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 188
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted No and against the House
One of 25 Crossbench No votes vs 19 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 189
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted No and against the House
One of 29 Crossbench No votes vs 12 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 191
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 21 Crossbench Aye votes vs 6 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 58
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted No and against the House
One of 11 Crossbench No votes vs 0 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 64
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cromwell voted Aye and against the House
One of 12 Crossbench Aye votes vs 0 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 83


Speeches
Lord Cromwell speeches from: Trail-hunting
Lord Cromwell contributed 1 speech (113 words)
Wednesday 18th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Lord Cromwell speeches from: Fujitsu: Post Office Horizon Case
Lord Cromwell contributed 1 speech (29 words)
Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Lord Cromwell speeches from: UK Space Economy
Lord Cromwell contributed 1 speech (70 words)
Wednesday 11th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Business and Trade
Lord Cromwell speeches from: Sustainable Farming Incentive: Small Farms
Lord Cromwell contributed 2 speeches (74 words)
Wednesday 11th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs


Written Answers
Fly-tipping: Private Property
Asked by: Lord Cromwell (Crossbench - Excepted Hereditary)
Thursday 5th March 2026

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answers by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 20 January (HL13504) and 21 January (HL13620), whether it is their policy that, where landowners cannot afford or are not technically able or qualified to remove waste, it will remain in place indefinitely.

Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

The Government may step in and clear waste in exceptional circumstances to protect the public and the environment. However, as with any other type of crime the Government cannot and should not fund a general clean-up service for criminals at the expense of the taxpayer. We do however acknowledge that this approach can sometimes leave waste in situ for long periods of time.

Heart Valve Disease: Diagnosis
Asked by: Lord Cromwell (Crossbench - Excepted Hereditary)
Monday 9th March 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the potential role of community pharmacies in supporting earlier detection of heart valve disease in at-risk groups.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

High blood pressure is a significant risk factor for developing heart valve disease. Early detection of high blood pressure in patients supports prevention of heart valve disease. That is why pharmacies in England can provide the NHS Hypertension Case-Finding Service (HCFS), under which eligible patients can have their blood pressure checked for free in a community pharmacy. The HCFS aims to identify patients with high blood pressure so that they can be referred to their general practice for treatment.

As set out in the 10-Year Health Plan, to accelerate progress on the ambition to reduce premature deaths from heart disease and stroke by 25% within a decade, we will publish a new Cardiovascular Disease Modern Service Framework in spring.

The framework will prioritise ambitious, evidence-led, and clinically informed approaches to prevention, treatment, and care, and as part of its development we are engaging widely to identify and consider the role of community pharmacies across the cardiovascular disease pathway.




Lord Cromwell mentioned

Deposited Papers
Wednesday 4th March 2026
Home Office
Source Page: Letter dated 25/02/2026 from Lord Hanson of Flint to Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer regarding issues raised in the Crime and Policing Bill committee stage debate: rural, heritage and wildlife crime. 3p.
Document: Crime_Policing_Bill_Rural_Heritage_and_Wildlife_Crime.pdf (PDF)

Found: I am copying this letter to Lord Cromwell, Lord Forbes of Newcastle, Earl Russell and Lord Davies of