All 2 Debates between Lord Collins of Highbury and Baroness Laing of Elderslie

Tue 25th Mar 2025

Gibraltar Treaty

Debate between Lord Collins of Highbury and Baroness Laing of Elderslie
Tuesday 3rd March 2026

(3 weeks, 5 days ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Collins of Highbury Portrait Lord Collins of Highbury (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I think the noble Lord is right. That is the principle we have adopted. In tomorrow’s newspapers, particularly those in Gibraltar, we will read that the Parliament of Gibraltar agree. It is a matter for Gibraltar; it is good news and I think we should appreciate that.

Baroness Laing of Elderslie Portrait Baroness Laing of Elderslie (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, it is good to hear that the Minister has a personal connection with Gibraltar and experience of working there, because there is so much misunderstanding about what Gibraltar is and who the people of Gibraltar are. Will he confirm that his Government recognise that Gibraltarians are not and never have been Spanish, that they are Gibraltarian, that they want to remain British, and have always said so? Will he further confirm that his Government recognise the strategic importance of Gibraltar as a base for the Royal Navy—an integral part of NATO operations in the Mediterranean and the surrounding district—and that that will always be respected?

House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

Debate between Lord Collins of Highbury and Baroness Laing of Elderslie
Lord Collins of Highbury Portrait Lord Collins of Highbury (Lab)
- Hansard - -

As the noble Lord knows, we are going to look at participation generally. That means that we have to engage in proper dialogue and consultation, so I do not accept the noble Lord’s point. I ask the noble Baroness to withdraw her amendment.

Baroness Laing of Elderslie Portrait Baroness Laing of Elderslie (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his assessment of the amendment that I have put before the Committee. It had not been my intention to have any argument ad hominem. I was not looking backwards in my tabling of this amendment in order to eject from the House any particular former Minister—and certainly not any sitting here.