Lord Callanan - Alert Sample

Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Callanan

Information between 14th March 2026 - 24th March 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

Division Votes
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 182 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 177
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 171
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 183 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 113
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 140 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 107
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Callanan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 156 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 225
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 159
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 175
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 155

Speeches
Lord Callanan speeches from: Ukraine: Reparation Lord Callanan contributed 1 speech (85 words) Monday 23rd March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Lord Callanan speeches from: Refugee Movements: Lebanon Lord Callanan contributed 1 speech (2 words) Thursday 19th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Lord Callanan speeches from: Strait of Hormuz Lord Callanan contributed 1 speech (87 words) Wednesday 18th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Lord Callanan speeches from: BBC World Service: Sustainability Lord Callanan contributed 1 speech (75 words) Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Lord Callanan speeches from: Treaty Scrutiny in Westminster (International Agreements Committee Report) Lord Callanan contributed 3 speeches (1,320 words) Monday 16th March 2026 - Grand Committee

Written Answers
Treaties: Parliamentary Scrutiny Asked by: Lord Callanan (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 17th March 2026 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the status of the Ponsonby Rule as a constitutional convention. Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development) The Ponsonby Rule on treaty scrutiny was put on a statutory footing by the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010. The Act requires treaties subject to ratification to be laid before Parliament for 21 sitting days.

Written Answers

Treaties: Parliamentary Scrutiny
Asked by: Lord Callanan (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 17th March 2026

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the status of the Ponsonby Rule as a constitutional convention.

Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development)

The Ponsonby Rule on treaty scrutiny was put on a statutory footing by the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010. The Act requires treaties subject to ratification to be laid before Parliament for 21 sitting days.

Lord Callanan mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Treaty Scrutiny in Westminster (International Agreements Committee Report) 42 speeches (14,721 words) Monday 16th March 2026 - Grand Committee Mentions: 1: Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Lab - Life peer) In answer to the question from the noble Lord, Lord Callanan, I do not know why the other place declined - Link to Speech 2: Lord Goldsmith (Lab - Life peer) I am afraid that the noble Lord, Lord Callanan, was not right that two things were missing from the report - Link to Speech

Parliamentary Debates

Treaty Scrutiny in Westminster (International Agreements Committee Report)
42 speeches (14,721 words)
Monday 16th March 2026 - Grand Committee

Mentions:
1: Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Lab - Life peer) In answer to the question from the noble Lord, Lord Callanan, I do not know why the other place declined - Link to Speech
2: Lord Goldsmith (Lab - Life peer) I am afraid that the noble Lord, Lord Callanan, was not right that two things were missing from the report - Link to Speech