Lord Callanan Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Callanan

Information between 10th March 2026 - 20th March 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 171
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 165 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 174
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 172 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 180
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 170
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 149 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 153
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 180
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 178 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 221
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 182 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 177
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 171
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 183 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 113
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Callanan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 140 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 107


Speeches
Lord Callanan speeches from: Refugee Movements: Lebanon
Lord Callanan contributed 1 speech (2 words)
Thursday 19th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Lord Callanan speeches from: Strait of Hormuz
Lord Callanan contributed 1 speech (87 words)
Wednesday 18th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Lord Callanan speeches from: BBC World Service: Sustainability
Lord Callanan contributed 1 speech (75 words)
Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Lord Callanan speeches from: Treaty Scrutiny in Westminster (International Agreements Committee Report)
Lord Callanan contributed 3 speeches (1,320 words)
Monday 16th March 2026 - Grand Committee


Written Answers
Chagos Islands: Sovereignty
Asked by: Lord Callanan (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 12th March 2026

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether any amendments to the 1966 Exchange of Notes between the UK and the USA in respect of the British Indian Ocean Territory will be subject to parliamentary approval under Part 2 of the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010.

Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development)

Once an updated agreement with the US has been finalised, we will set out the process for bringing that agreement into force, according to the appropriate procedures.

Treaties: Parliamentary Scrutiny
Asked by: Lord Callanan (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 17th March 2026

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the status of the Ponsonby Rule as a constitutional convention.

Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development)

The Ponsonby Rule on treaty scrutiny was put on a statutory footing by the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010. The Act requires treaties subject to ratification to be laid before Parliament for 21 sitting days.




Lord Callanan mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Treaty Scrutiny in Westminster (International Agreements Committee Report)
42 speeches (14,721 words)
Monday 16th March 2026 - Grand Committee

Mentions:
1: Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Lab - Life peer) In answer to the question from the noble Lord, Lord Callanan, I do not know why the other place declined - Link to Speech
2: Lord Goldsmith (Lab - Life peer) I am afraid that the noble Lord, Lord Callanan, was not right that two things were missing from the report - Link to Speech