Information between 2nd March 2024 - 11th April 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 162 Conservative No votes vs 5 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 180 |
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 160 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 169 |
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 161 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 274 Noes - 172 |
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 162 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 171 |
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 157 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 167 |
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 164 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 184 |
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 160 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 171 |
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 155 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 160 |
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 167 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 189 |
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 165 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 181 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 178 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 192 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 180 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 193 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 178 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 199 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 180 Conservative No votes vs 5 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 192 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 175 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 187 |
13 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 145 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 154 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 201 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 249 Noes - 219 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 205 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 263 Noes - 233 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 203 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 226 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 196 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 209 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 208 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 230 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 203 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 228 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Caine voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 200 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 251 Noes - 214 |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Operation Kenova Interim Report: Response
1 speech (384 words) Monday 11th March 2024 - Written Statements Northern Ireland Office Mentions: 1: Chris Heaton-Harris (Con - Daventry) My noble Friend the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Lord Caine) has made - Link to Speech |
Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill
175 speeches (38,738 words) Report stage Monday 4th March 2024 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated - Life peer) information about how Article 2 works.In a Written Answer to me on the Rwanda Bill, the noble Lord, Lord - Link to Speech |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Wednesday 20th March 2024
Written Evidence - Spirit AeroSystems DSN0003 - Defence Spending in Northern Ireland Defence Spending in Northern Ireland - Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Found: We sponsored the report, and it was launched in Parliament with the support of Lord Caine, Parliamentary |
Wednesday 13th March 2024
Oral Evidence - Cabinet Office, Veterinary Medicines Directorate, DEFRA, and Cabinet Office Veterinary medicines and the Windsor Framework - Windsor Framework Sub-Committee Found: Lord Hain: I have been in correspondence with the noble Lord Caine; it is no criticism of him in his |
Written Answers |
---|
Northern Ireland Protocol
Asked by: Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated - Life peer) Monday 18th March 2024 Question to the Northern Ireland Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Caine on 12 March (HL3032), to specify all the changes made to the protocol by the Windsor Framework; and whether Article 6 of the Acts of Union is affected by the protocol or the Windsor Framework. Answered by Lord Caine - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government’s position on the Windsor Framework, and its interaction with Article 6 of the Acts of Union, is set out in full in the Command Papers of 27 February 2023 and 31 January 2024.
|
Northern Ireland Protocol
Asked by: Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated - Life peer) Tuesday 12th March 2024 Question to the Northern Ireland Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Caine on 4 March and with regard to paragraphs 54 and 65 of the relevant Supreme Court judgment, whether they can confirm that the inconsistency between the Acts of Union and the protocol was not at issue before the Supreme Court because the Government did not lodge any cross appeal from the Court of Appeal’s decision that such inconsistency existed. Answered by Lord Caine - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Supreme Court clearly set out in its judgement of 8 February 2023 the issues it considered and its reasoning for reaching the conclusions it did. The Government’s consistent position on these matters is set out in the Safeguarding the Union Command Paper, which is that the Windsor Framework (which replaced the old Protocol) applies entirely consistently with Northern Ireland’s constitutional position within the United Kingdom, including as expressed in the relevant statute today. |
Department Publications - News and Communications |
---|
Wednesday 27th March 2024
Northern Ireland Office Source Page: The Lord Caine visits Downpatrick and highlights the resilience of the community and businesses after Storm Ciarán Document: The Lord Caine visits Downpatrick and highlights the resilience of the community and businesses after Storm Ciarán (webpage) Found: The Lord Caine visits Downpatrick and highlights the resilience of the community and businesses after |