All 2 Debates between Lord Browne of Ladyton and Lord Douglas-Miller

Water Companies: Licence Conditions

Debate between Lord Browne of Ladyton and Lord Douglas-Miller
Wednesday 1st May 2024

(7 months, 3 weeks ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Douglas-Miller Portrait Lord Douglas-Miller (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The capital requirement will be considered at the next spending review, which is due this year, so we will hear more about that in due course.

Lord Browne of Ladyton Portrait Lord Browne of Ladyton (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, once again, your Lordships’ House is indebted to the forensic skills of my noble friend Lord Sikka. He is the one person in this House who needs no instruction about where to look for what is going on in businesses and in companies, and how important accounts are. With some assistance from him, I had a look at Thames Water’s accounts. Its accounts, directors’ reports and cash-flow statements say that it paid dividends to its parent company as follows: £37 million in 2022, £45 million in 2023, and another £37.5 million in September 2023. However, its own PR spin says that these are not dividends and that this is the way it is paying interest on its debt. That is not what the accounts are for, and the accounts are not right if that is correct. In December, a spokesperson for Ofwat said:

“Following notification that Thames Water has paid a dividend to shareholders, Ofwat is investigating whether this payment meets its licence requirements”.


The Minister is a knowledgeable man in this area, as he tells us, so he should be able to explain what is to be investigated. More importantly, does he know why Ofwat has not reported since December?

Lord Douglas-Miller Portrait Lord Douglas-Miller (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I also pay tribute to the accountancy skills of the noble Lord, Lord Sikka; they are very thorough. Indeed, the noble Lord, Lord Browne, has himself made an extremely good attempt at interpreting the accounts on that front. The issues around Thames Water and the dividend that it paid last year are subject to an investigation at the moment. Therefore, it would not be appropriate for me to comment on them.

Right to Roam

Debate between Lord Browne of Ladyton and Lord Douglas-Miller
Wednesday 21st February 2024

(10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Douglas-Miller Portrait Lord Douglas-Miller (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

It seems like a similar issue to bikes on pavements—bikes on paths in the countryside. This is a really difficult area, and one I come across a lot in my private life, with people accessing the countryside in inappropriate ways. Paths are narrow, and it is often quite dangerous when someone on a mountain bike, or a group of people on mountain bikes, is coming down that path. It is intimidating, and it is very challenging to find a safe place and a safe way to make those two meet. I sympathise with my noble friend.

Lord Browne of Ladyton Portrait Lord Browne of Ladyton (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, traditionally, people in Scotland have been allowed freely to access the outdoors. I am 71 years of age, and all my life I have known that I was free to walk anywhere, as long as I did not do any damage. This was codified in the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003, which set out the conditions that you must observe if you do so. Can we not just adopt the same here and let people enjoy this? it does not cause any problems.

Lord Douglas-Miller Portrait Lord Douglas-Miller (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

As a resident in Scotland, I would not necessarily agree with everything that the noble Lord has said. It is a devolved issue, and Scotland is entitled to make its own decisions on this.