Information between 1st January 2025 - 20th February 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Calendar |
---|
Thursday 13th March 2025 11 a.m. Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe (Labour - Life peer) Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Implementing an updated public-private partnership model to attract capital investment and to open share ownership to more people View calendar - Add to calendar |
Division Votes |
---|
28 Jan 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 122 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 145 Noes - 126 |
21 Jan 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 162 |
21 Jan 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 159 |
21 Jan 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 138 |
21 Jan 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 157 |
8 Jan 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 228 |
11 Feb 2025 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 156 |
Speeches |
---|
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe speeches from: Economic Growth: Public Spending
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe contributed 1 speech (79 words) Wednesday 12th February 2025 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury |
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe speeches from: National Cancer Plan
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe contributed 1 speech (305 words) Monday 10th February 2025 - Lords Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe speeches from: UK–China Economic and Financial Strategy Dialogue
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe contributed 1 speech (43 words) Tuesday 4th February 2025 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury |
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe speeches from: Asylum Seekers: Accommodation
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe contributed 1 speech (83 words) Thursday 16th January 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe speeches from: Health: Obesity
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe contributed 1 speech (64 words) Tuesday 7th January 2025 - Lords Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
Written Answers |
---|
Written Questions: Costs
Asked by: Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 21st January 2025 Question To ask the Leader of the House what was the average cost of responding to a Question for Written Answer tabled in the House of Lords in the most recent year for which figures are available. Answered by Baroness Smith of Basildon - Leader of the House of Lords and Lord Privy Seal The information requested is not held. The cost to the public purse of answering written parliamentary questions depends on numerous factors, including the size of parliamentary teams, volumes of parliamentary questions submitted, and the complexity of the question asked (and required policy work to answer it), amongst other factors. The Cabinet Office’s Guide to Parliamentary Work (available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guide-to-parliamentary-work) sets out: “There is an advisory cost limit known as the disproportionate cost threshold which is the level above which departments can decide not to answer a written question. The current disproportionate cost threshold is £850.” |
Digital Technology: Proof of Identity
Asked by: Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe (Labour - Life peer) Monday 17th February 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of remarks by Tony Blair to The Times on 1 February regarding the potential use of digital identity to help solve immigration and other problems. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) Digital right to work and right to rent checks are already in place for migrants and British or Irish citizens. For British passport, and Irish passport or passport card holders, employers and landlords can already choose to use digital identity services which are independently certified against Government standards. This can reduce business costs and enable individuals to access work and housing much faster, and more easily. Foreign nationals can also use their eVisa to evidence their status in the UK and for identification purposes. |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Thursday 30th January 2025
Government Response - Government response to the Committee's special inquiry report Food, Diet and Obesity Committee |