Defence: 2.5% GDP Spending Commitment Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateDepartment: Ministry of Defence
Lord Bridges of Headley
Main Page: Lord Bridges of Headley (Conservative - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Bridges of Headley's debates with the Ministry of Defence
Defence: 2.5% GDP Spending Commitment
Lord Bridges of Headley Excerpts(1 month ago)
Lords ChamberRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Coaker (Lab)
The noble Lord makes a very important point. I was in the Republic of Korea recently to talk about the importance of hybrid warfare and information wars. We must consider that fully when we get the defence review and ensure that our hybrid capability is a match for anybody’s. That involves trying to influence others opposing us at the present time.
Lord Bridges of Headley (Con)
My Lords, according to the OBR, if the Government were to meet their ambition to increase defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by the end of the Parliament, they would break their new debt rule. Which is more important: the 2.5% target or the debt rule?
Lord Coaker (Lab)
I am not a Treasury Minister, but I know as a Defence Minister that 2.5% of GDP is an absolute commitment. I hope the Treasury is successful, because if we get the growth in the economy that we want, that 2.5% will be of a much larger amount.