Procedure of the House (Proposal 4)

Debate between Lord Brabazon of Tara and Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton

Tuesday 8th November 2011 Lords Chamber

[Baroness Noakes]

My Lords, I have one point to raise in connection with this, which comes back to courtesy in the House and which ran through the debates on the first proposal. If Members of this House were more courteous to each other, we would not have the problems that are perceived during Question Time. Often in Question Time, Ministers do not give Answers that merit any thanks whatever, but occasionally they give extremely helpful Answers. It seems to me that it would be improper that the Companion should debar the questioner from thanking the Minister for a useful Answer. While I am all in favour of stopping the ritual of thanking for Questions and Answers, the way in which this has now been expressed is wrong because it debars Members of the House from normal courtesy.

[Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton]

My Lords, I will make just a brief observation. Occasionally, the length of the reply does not assist the person who asked the Question but is an attempt to prevent their answering it.

[The Chairman of Committees (Lord Brabazon of Tara)]

My Lords, as your Lordships know, I am completely neutral on these proposals and have no views. I therefore put the Question. I beg to move that proposal 4 be agreed to.

House of Lords Reform Bill [HL]

Debate between Lord Brabazon of Tara and Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton

Friday 21st October 2011 Lords Chamber

[Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton]

My Lords, I beg to move that the Question be now put.

[The Chairman of Committees (Lord Brabazon of Tara)]

I was going to put the Question in any case. The Question is that the House do now resolve itself into a Committee upon the Bill. As many as are of that opinion will say Content.