Information between 1st September 2026 - 21st September 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Prime Minister: Religion
Asked by: Lord Birt (Crossbench - Life peer) Tuesday 1st September 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 29 June (HL1380), whether they will answer the question put, namely whether they will legislate to ensure that a Prime Minister of any faith can discharge all of his or her duties. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Parliamentary Secretary (Cabinet Office) The Government recognises that there are historical restrictions on duties in statute, particularly in relation to the making of and advising on Church appointments. We will keep this under review. |
|
Prisoners' Release
Asked by: Lord Birt (Crossbench - Life peer) Tuesday 15th September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to review the process for supervising serious, serial violent offenders when they are released after having served their term. Answered by Lord Lemos - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice) This Government inherited a prisons system days from collapse. We had no choice but to take decisive action to stop our prisons overflowing and keep the public safe. Our landmark Sentencing Act 2026 will now deliver a more sustainable solution to the prison capacity crisis we inherited, including through the progression model, which will help ensure there are always enough prison places for the courts to be able to send people to custody. The Prime Minister’s review informed decisions relating to implementation of the progression model and subsequent offence exclusions. The Government carefully considered concerns raised by victims, survivors, parliamentarians and the wider public and acted on those concerns and representations received during the review formed part of the evidence considered as part of that process. Ministers continue to engage with a range of stakeholders on implementation. As a result, offenders convicted of unlawful killing offence such as manslaughter, causing death by dangerous driving, as well as further historic child sex offences, will now be excluded, on top of rape and serious child sex offences. This also includes offenders convicted of offences involving the killing of an emergency worker. A full list of exclusions can be found here: Sentencing Act 2026 offence exclusions - GOV.UK. These exclusions are in addition to the existing exclusion of more than 18,000 offenders serving more serious sentences. The progression model amends release points for offenders serving Standard Determinate Sentences. The date from which the progression model will apply, and the date of the first tranche of releases is 1 October 2026. Offenders released under the progression model will be controlled under strict licence conditions and can be recalled to custody where they breach those conditions or their risk can no longer be safely managed in the community. This Government is committed to strengthening public protection and ensuring the Probation Service has the tools and capacity it needs to keep communities safe and protect victims. We are investing £700 million into probation and community services, recruiting 1,300 additional probation officers this year, and ensuring every prison leaver is tagged unless there is clear reason not to. As part of that investment, we are delivering the biggest expansion of tagging in history, by investing £100 million to expand our ability to monitor even more individuals in the community with thousands of offenders having their every movement tracked. These changes will significantly strengthen probation’s ability to monitor offenders in real time and intervene quickly where risk escalates or conditions are breached. Offenders may also be subject to a range of measures such as curfews and exclusion zones that are designed to manage risk and restrict their movements where necessary. With the conditions imposed upon them, this will allow probation to maintain oversight of offenders in the community and monitor compliance. The Government is ensuring probation resources are focused on offenders who pose the highest risk of harm and prioritised on those most likely to reoffend. This enables probation practitioners to spend more time and attention managing the most serious offenders, strengthening public protection and better protecting victims. All offenders released from custody are subject to robust supervision and risk management arrangements. Where released on licence, they may be subject to a range of restrictive licence conditions tailored to the risks they present, including electronic monitoring, exclusion zones and non-contact requirements. Probation practitioners monitor compliance with these requirements and may take enforcement action, including recall to custody, where an offender can no longer be safely managed in the community. Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) provide additional oversight for those offenders who meet the relevant threshold. From October 2026, the Probation Service will be given wider powers to impose new restrictive licence conditions, including prohibiting offenders on licence from driving, attending public events, and entering pubs, clubs and bars. We are also introducing Restriction Zones for the most serious sexual and violent offenders, which require an offender to remain within a designated area where this is necessary and proportionate to manage risk. The Government is also committed to ensuring that victims' interests are reflected in release and supervision arrangements. Victims eligible for the Victim Contact Scheme have a statutory right to receive information about an offender's release and to make representations about licence conditions. When determining appropriate licence conditions, account may be taken of both the risk of physical harm and the risk of significant emotional or psychological harm to victims. Together, these measures will strengthen public protection, support victim safety and ensure that the most serious offenders receive the highest levels of supervision and risk management in the community. |
|
Offenders: Bail
Asked by: Lord Birt (Crossbench - Life peer) Tuesday 15th September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to review the process for allowing serious, serial violent offenders to be bailed. Answered by Lord Lemos - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice) The decision to remand an individual into custody or to grant bail is solely a matter for the independent judiciary acting in accordance with the criteria set out in the Bail Act 1976. When courts (magistrates or judges) are presiding over a case they decide on a case-by-case basis based on the evidence put before the court whether the defendant presents such a bail risk as to warrant custody. Risks that may be considered by a court in order to refuse bail include whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the defendant would commit further offences while on bail or engage in conduct that would cause physical or mental injury, or fear of injury, to an associated person. |
|
Electricity: Data Centres
Asked by: Lord Birt (Crossbench - Life peer) Tuesday 15th September 2026 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask His Majesty's Government what is their estimate of the additional electricity needed to power data centres by 2035; and how they intend that electricity to be generated. Answered by Baroness Curran - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) Data centre demand growth remains uncertain, reflecting factors including new connections, utilisation, efficiency improvements and wider AI adoption. The Department is working with NESO, Ofgem and industry to monitor developments and assess plausible demand scenarios and their implications for the electricity system. Government is rapidly expanding renewable generation, providing access to increasingly clean power through the electricity network. Economy-wide demand projections will inform decisions on the generation, network and flexibility infrastructure needed to maintain a secure, affordable and decarbonised electricity system. In realising AI’s potential, the Government will also take seriously the potential risks identified by experts of its development. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
3 Sep 2026, 3:01 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Lord Birt not moved, not moved and " Speaker 16 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
3 Sep 2026, 3:02 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "77 Lord Birt not moved. " Speaker 16 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
3 Sep 2026, 3:20 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "I think the noble Lord Birt was right to remind us that perhaps we need something rather more " Speaker 17 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
3 Sep 2026, 3:48 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "the the point, the question from Lord Birt and the noble Lord, Lord Clement Jones, the " Speaker 7 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
3 Sep 2026, 4:55 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Lord Birt not moved and 90 and 91 " Speaker 10 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
3 Sep 2026, 4:55 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Lord Birt not moved. " Speaker 10 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
1 Sep 2026, 6:39 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Lord Birt not moved. " Speaker 3 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
1 Sep 2026, 6:18 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "My Lord, can I first of all congratulate the noble Lord Birt on what I think " Speaker 5 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
1 Sep 2026, 6:18 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "to a very different answers, and I come to the same conclusion as the noble Lord Birt. " Speaker 5 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
1 Sep 2026, 6:19 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Lord, Lord Birt, correctly widens the definition of digital service providers to include " Speaker 5 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
1 Sep 2026, 6:20 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Lord of Lord Birt, which I actually prefer to my own. " Speaker 5 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
1 Sep 2026, 6:21 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "This structural foundation would enable a vital reform suggested by the noble Lord Birt. " Speaker 5 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
1 Sep 2026, 6:22 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Lord, let me start by thanking the noble Lord, Lord Birt, for introducing this debate " Speaker 7 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
1 Sep 2026, 7:23 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "and . 11 Lord Birt not moved. " Speaker 8 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Sep 2026, 6:28 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "of AI, the huge complexity that the noble Lord Birt has been setting out, all these different " Speaker 13 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Sep 2026, 3:04 p.m. - House of Lords "moment to thank the noble and learned Lord Birt Baroness Mallalieu, and I hope you'll forgive me if I pronounce that " The Lord Bishop of Hereford (Bishops) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill
59 speeches (15,546 words) Committee stage Monday 7th September 2026 - Grand Committee Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport Mentions: 1: Lord Londesborough (XB - Life peer) office for cyber resilience proposed by the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, and my noble friend Lord Birt - Link to Speech 2: Lord Clement-Jones (LD - Life peer) Northover, and will add my support to the very useful speeches from the noble Lords, Lord Vaizey, Lord Birt - Link to Speech 3: Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Lab - Life peer) incident support 24/7 with Cyber Essentials.The noble Lords, Lord Vaizey, Lord Londesborough and Lord Birt - Link to Speech 4: Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Con - Life peer) hole of the absence of AI and the huge complexity of all the different regimes that the noble Lord, Lord Birt - Link to Speech |
|
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill
131 speeches (30,197 words) Committee stage Thursday 3rd September 2026 - Grand Committee Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport Mentions: 1: None The answer was already on the amendment paper under Amendment 88 from the noble Lord, Lord Birt, which - Link to Speech 2: None The noble Lord, Lord Birt, mentioned his Amendment 91, which we think is entirely complementary to these - Link to Speech 3: Lord Clement-Jones (LD - Life peer) My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Birt, was right to remind us that we perhaps need something rather more - Link to Speech 4: Lord Markham (Con - Life peer) to try to take a more strategic view, very much reflecting some of the views that the noble Lord, Lord Birt - Link to Speech 5: Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Lab - Life peer) To the point raised by the noble Lord, Lord Birt, I believe that that is a clear test. - Link to Speech |
|
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill
80 speeches (25,850 words) Committee stage Tuesday 1st September 2026 - Grand Committee Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport Mentions: 1: Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Con - Life peer) My Lords, if I may, I will reiterate points that the noble Lord, Lord Birt, has made. - Link to Speech 2: Viscount Camrose (Con - Life peer) My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Birt, for introducing this debate and all noble Lords who have - Link to Speech 3: Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Lab - Life peer) I thank the noble Lords, Lord Birt and Lord Clement-Jones, for their introduction to this section and - Link to Speech 4: Lord Ravensdale (XB - Life peer) However, as the noble Lord, Lord Birt, said in the debate on the previous group, quantum is the other - Link to Speech |