Information between 27th October 2025 - 16th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted Aye and in line with the House One of 41 Crossbench Aye votes vs 4 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 153 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted Aye and against the House One of 22 Crossbench Aye votes vs 12 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 133 Noes - 188 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted Aye and against the House One of 29 Crossbench Aye votes vs 9 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 128 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted Aye and against the House One of 4 Crossbench Aye votes vs 1 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 49 Noes - 110 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted Aye and in line with the House One of 10 Crossbench Aye votes vs 4 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 139 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted Aye and in line with the House One of 13 Crossbench Aye votes vs 1 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 137 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted Aye and in line with the House One of 30 Crossbench Aye votes vs 13 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 157 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted No and in line with the House One of 18 Crossbench No votes vs 4 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 194 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted Aye and against the House One of 11 Crossbench Aye votes vs 8 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 140 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted No and in line with the House One of 17 Crossbench No votes vs 0 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 200 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted No and in line with the House One of 9 Crossbench No votes vs 5 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 72 Noes - 147 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted Aye and against the House One of 21 Crossbench Aye votes vs 2 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 107 Noes - 136 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted Aye and against the House One of 12 Crossbench Aye votes vs 10 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 169 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted No and in line with the House One of 22 Crossbench No votes vs 4 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted No and in line with the House One of 19 Crossbench No votes vs 5 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted Aye and against the House One of 8 Crossbench Aye votes vs 11 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 66 Noes - 175 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted No and in line with the House One of 20 Crossbench No votes vs 2 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Best voted Aye and against the House One of 19 Crossbench Aye votes vs 25 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 195 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Best speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill
Lord Best contributed 3 speeches (1,508 words) Report stage: Part 1 Monday 27th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Lord Best speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill
Lord Best contributed 1 speech (346 words) Report stage: Part 2 Monday 27th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
30 Oct 2025, 3:30 p.m. - House of Commons "happened. In 2019, the government commissioned the independent Lord best to make his report. He did, and he laid out sensible solutions " Gideon Amos MP (Taunton and Wellington, Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 3:15 p.m. - House of Commons "Deputy Speaker, Lord Best, who is the Chair of the Regulation of Property Agents Working Group, said " Pam Cox MP (Colchester, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 3:54 p.m. - House of Commons "by Lord best to advise them on how to do it. Yet they failed to respond to the group's final report, " Matthew Pennycook MP, Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Greenwich and Woolwich, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Property Service Charges
95 speeches (22,200 words) Thursday 30th October 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Pam Cox (Lab - Colchester) Lord Best, chair of the Regulation of Property Agents Working Group, said in his recent evidence to the - Link to Speech 2: Gideon Amos (LD - Taunton and Wellington) decades, but very little seems to have happened.In 2019, the Government commissioned the independent Lord Best - Link to Speech 3: Matthew Pennycook (Lab - Greenwich and Woolwich) They asked a working group, chaired by Lord Best, to advise them on how to do it. - Link to Speech |
|
Planning and Infrastructure Bill
94 speeches (18,915 words) Report stage: Part 2 Monday 27th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: None grateful to all those who have signed this amendment— my noble friend Lord Banner and the noble Lords, Lord Best - Link to Speech 2: Lord Shipley (LD - Life peer) My Lords, like the noble Lord, Lord Best, I hope the Minister will be in a frame of mind to accept the - Link to Speech |
|
Planning and Infrastructure Bill
100 speeches (26,357 words) Report stage: Part 1 Monday 27th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Baroness Thornhill (LD - Life peer) thanking my noble friend Lady Pinnock for pitching in on the amendments tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Best - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Con - Life peer) My Lords, Amendments 89 and 97, tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Best, would mean that the homes we build - Link to Speech 3: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) housing strategy, I am sure the Minister in the other place has listened carefully to the noble Lord, Lord Best - Link to Speech 4: None Amendment 97, tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Best, seeks to ensure that strategic planning authorities - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Tuesday 4th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Centre for Competition Policy, and Oxford University Industry and Regulators Committee Found: November 2025 10.05 am Watch the meeting Members present: Baroness Taylor of Bolton (The Chair); Lord Best |
|
Tuesday 28th October 2025
Oral Evidence - Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government, Building Safety Regulator, and Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government Building Safety Regulator - Industry and Regulators Committee Found: 28 October 2025 10 am Watch the meeting Members present: Baroness Taylor of Bolton (The Chair); Lord Best |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Property Management Companies
Asked by: Suella Braverman (Conservative - Fareham and Waterlooville) Tuesday 4th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of freehold management practices on the ability of leaseholders to sell properties. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The government is committed to ensuring that those living in the rented and leasehold sectors are protected from abuse and poor service at the hands of unscrupulous property agents. Property agents must already belong to a government-approved redress scheme. This legislative requirement is currently enforced by local authorities and by the National Trading Standards’ Lettings and Estate Agency Team, who have the power to issue warnings and banning orders to rogue estate and letting agents. The redress schemes publish data on the number of complaints they receive, the amount awarded to consumers, and maintain a public list of agents that have been expelled from their respective schemes. Many leaseholders face persistent delays and high costs when trying to sell their properties. Currently, freeholders and managing agents are responsible for providing essential sales information, but they often have little incentive to do so efficiently. Homeowners living on private or mixed tenure estates, who contribute to the maintenance and upkeep of communal areas, can face similar challenges when trying to obtain relevant information from their estate manager. The government will take forward measures in the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 (LFRA) which will speed up the provision of information for leaseholders and homeowners on private or mixed tenure estates who wish to sell their property, and protect sellers from unreasonable fees when requesting this information. The previous government committed to regulate the property agent sector in 2018 and asked a working group Chaired by Lord Best to advise them how to do it, yet it failed to respond to their findings from 2019. Managing agents play a key role in the maintenance of multi-occupancy buildings and freehold estates, and their importance will only increase as we transition toward a commonhold future, and so we are looking again at Lord Best’s 2019 report on regulating the property agent sector, particularly in light of the recommendations in the final Grenfell Inquiry report. On 4 July 2025, we launched a wide-ranging consultation on proposals to hold landlords and managing agents to account for the services they provide and the charges and fees they levy. This included a number of proposals recommended by Lord Best, including the introduction of mandatory qualifications for managing agents and estate managers on freehold estates. We are clear that this consultation is not the final step in the regulation of managing agents and we will continue to reflect on the various other recommendations made in the 2019 report. We will set out our full position on regulation of estate, letting and managing agents in due course. |
|
Property Management Companies
Asked by: Suella Braverman (Conservative - Fareham and Waterlooville) Tuesday 4th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if his Department will publish a register of freehold management companies subject to repeated (a) complaints and (b) enforcement action. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The government is committed to ensuring that those living in the rented and leasehold sectors are protected from abuse and poor service at the hands of unscrupulous property agents. Property agents must already belong to a government-approved redress scheme. This legislative requirement is currently enforced by local authorities and by the National Trading Standards’ Lettings and Estate Agency Team, who have the power to issue warnings and banning orders to rogue estate and letting agents. The redress schemes publish data on the number of complaints they receive, the amount awarded to consumers, and maintain a public list of agents that have been expelled from their respective schemes. Many leaseholders face persistent delays and high costs when trying to sell their properties. Currently, freeholders and managing agents are responsible for providing essential sales information, but they often have little incentive to do so efficiently. Homeowners living on private or mixed tenure estates, who contribute to the maintenance and upkeep of communal areas, can face similar challenges when trying to obtain relevant information from their estate manager. The government will take forward measures in the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 (LFRA) which will speed up the provision of information for leaseholders and homeowners on private or mixed tenure estates who wish to sell their property, and protect sellers from unreasonable fees when requesting this information. The previous government committed to regulate the property agent sector in 2018 and asked a working group Chaired by Lord Best to advise them how to do it, yet it failed to respond to their findings from 2019. Managing agents play a key role in the maintenance of multi-occupancy buildings and freehold estates, and their importance will only increase as we transition toward a commonhold future, and so we are looking again at Lord Best’s 2019 report on regulating the property agent sector, particularly in light of the recommendations in the final Grenfell Inquiry report. On 4 July 2025, we launched a wide-ranging consultation on proposals to hold landlords and managing agents to account for the services they provide and the charges and fees they levy. This included a number of proposals recommended by Lord Best, including the introduction of mandatory qualifications for managing agents and estate managers on freehold estates. We are clear that this consultation is not the final step in the regulation of managing agents and we will continue to reflect on the various other recommendations made in the 2019 report. We will set out our full position on regulation of estate, letting and managing agents in due course. |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 11th November 2025 10 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Regulators and growth At 10:00am: Oral evidence Ben Ramanauskas - Senior Research Fellow at Policy Exchange Anne Pardoe - Head of Policy at Citizens Advice View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 18th November 2025 10 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Regulators and growth At 10:00am: Oral evidence Dan Elliot - Founder and Director at Frontier Economics Simon Wilde - Partner at Oxera View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 25th November 2025 2 p.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Water regulation View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 25th November 2025 10 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Private Meeting Subject: The Building Safety Regulator View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025 10 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Private Meeting Subject: The Building Safety Regulator View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
7 Oct 2025
Regulators and growth Industry and Regulators Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 9 Jan 2026) No description available |
| Scottish Government Publications |
|---|
|
Thursday 30th October 2025
Local Government and Housing Directorate Source Page: Towards a shared understanding of housing affordability: short life working group, 2022-24 Document: Towards a Shared Understanding of Housing Affordability: Short Life Working Group Scottish Government, 2022-24 (PDF) Found: independent curated focus group meetings with renters (drawing on previous experience from the 2019 Lord Best |