All 2 Debates between Lord Bellingham and Chris Skidmore

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lord Bellingham and Chris Skidmore
Wednesday 5th July 2017

(7 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Chris Skidmore Portrait The Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office (Chris Skidmore)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Government believe that electoral fraud is unacceptable on any level. We have a clear path to building a democracy that is both clear and secure, and we will work closely with key partner organisations to deliver a comprehensive programme of work for reforming our electoral system and strengthening electoral integrity.

Lord Bellingham Portrait Sir Henry Bellingham
- Hansard - -

Is the Minister aware that there is now clear evidence that many students boasted on social media of voting twice—once at university, and once by post at home? Surely this is straightforward electoral fraud.

Chris Skidmore Portrait Chris Skidmore
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The offence of double voting that my hon. Friend mentions is completely unacceptable. Indeed, it is nothing less than an abuse of our democracy. I am meeting Sir John Holmes, the chair of the Electoral Commission, this afternoon, and I intend to raise this with him as a priority. Let all of us in this House be clear: this is a crime. If anyone has any evidence of people voting twice, they should report it to their local returning officer and the police, who must take this issue seriously.

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Bellingham Portrait Sir Henry Bellingham (North West Norfolk) (Con)
- Hansard - -

T7. Further to my earlier question about students fraudulently voting twice, may I ask whether, when my hon. Friend meets representatives of the Electoral Commission, he will ensure that the police are involved as well?

Chris Skidmore Portrait Chris Skidmore
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

When it comes to the issue of electoral fraud and double voting, I will ensure that we involve all our electoral partners, including the police.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lord Bellingham and Chris Skidmore
Wednesday 2nd November 2016

(8 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Chris Skidmore Portrait Chris Skidmore
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Lady is right, but there is a problem with young people’s registration: we allow 16-year-olds to register to vote, but only 37% of them choose to do so. As I said earlier, we need to take account of the issues that matter to young people. Such issues will be debated by the Youth Parliament next Friday, but none of those to which the hon. Lady refers are on the agenda.

Lord Bellingham Portrait Sir Henry Bellingham (North West Norfolk) (Con)
- Hansard - -

2. How he plans to give UK citizens living overseas the right to vote for life.

Glyn Davies Portrait Glyn Davies (Montgomeryshire) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

10. What progress he has made on giving UK citizens living overseas the right to vote for life.

Chris Skidmore Portrait The Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office (Chris Skidmore)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On 7 October the Government published a policy statement setting out our detailed proposals for votes for life, and explaining how we plan to meet our manifesto commitment to scrap the 15-year time limit for overseas voting. We intend the system to be in place before the next scheduled UK parliamentary general election.

Lord Bellingham Portrait Sir Henry Bellingham
- Hansard - -

I thank the Minister for that encouraging reply, but may I return to the subject of cutting the cost of politics? Can he tell us when the Government will be able to equalise the size of constituencies?

Chris Skidmore Portrait Chris Skidmore
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are determined that by the time of the 2020 general election, the historic principle of equal seats will be in place. If we do not introduce that reform, we will be fighting our seats on the basis of data that go back to the year 2000, meaning that they are 20 years out of date. That is completely unacceptable, which is why we must press ahead with boundary reform.