All 1 Debates between Lord Beith and Lord Rooker

Share Page

Mon 17th Oct 2016
Investigatory Powers Bill
Lords Chamber
Report: 2nd sitting (Hansard - part two): House of Lords & Report: 2nd sitting (Hansard - part two): House of Lords

Investigatory Powers Bill

Debate between Lord Beith and Lord Rooker
Report: 2nd sitting (Hansard - part two): House of Lords
Monday 17th October 2016

(8 years, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Share Debate
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: HL Bill 62-III Third marshalled list for Report (PDF, 153KB) - (17 Oct 2016)
Lord Rooker Portrait Lord Rooker
- Hansard -
- - Excerpts

I submit that they could. The lawyers will find a way to fill the courts with challenges from the crooks and spivs we are trying to protect the British public from. But I will wait for the Minister’s technical answer, rather than the one I gave.

Lord Beith Portrait Lord Beith (LD)
- Hansard -
-

To pose a legal challenge which is not based on any instance or evidence of the basis on which such a challenge could be made—I certainly cannot think of a basis on which someone could require the production of knowledge of the means used for interception, based on existing legislation.

Return to start of debate - Return to top of page