Lord Bassam of Brighton Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Bassam of Brighton

Information between 17th July 2025 - 25th September 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Calendar
Wednesday 3rd September 2025
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer)

Oral questions - Main Chamber
Subject: Football Governance Act 2025
View calendar - Add to calendar


Division Votes
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 140
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 130
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 139 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 143
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 162
22 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 116 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 17 Noes - 120
22 Jul 2025 - Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 145 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 267
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 198
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 138
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 137 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 143
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 113 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 127
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 189


Speeches
Lord Bassam of Brighton speeches from: Merck Research Site
Lord Bassam of Brighton contributed 1 speech (76 words)
Thursday 11th September 2025 - Lords Chamber
Department for Energy Security & Net Zero
Lord Bassam of Brighton speeches from: Football Governance Act 2025: Implementation
Lord Bassam of Brighton contributed 2 speeches (124 words)
Wednesday 3rd September 2025 - Lords Chamber
Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport


Written Answers
Religious Buildings: Conservation
Asked by: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer)
Wednesday 17th September 2025

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they have taken to meet representatives from UK Cluniac sites to discuss the progression of the European Federation of Cluniac Sites UNESCO World Heritage bid, and the inclusion of those sites on a UK tentative list.

Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

DCMS and Historic England, as our statutory advisers on heritage, regularly discuss sites and places we know to be interested in UNESCO World Heritage status, and have previously met and written to representatives from UK Cluniac sites.

With the large number of UK World Heritage Sites and our commitment to supporting UNESCO’s ambition for a more globally balanced and representative World Heritage List, the UK Government does not currently have plans to consider additional sites for nomination to UNESCO, beyond those already included on the UK’s Tentative List.

No recent formal assessments have been made by Historic England of sites for inclusion on the UK’s Tentative List. Applications to the 2022/23 Tentative List Review were assessed by an independent expert panel and the Government response was published in July 2023.

Religious Buildings: Conservation
Asked by: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer)
Wednesday 17th September 2025

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask His Majesty's Government what conclusions were drawn from any recent assessments by Historic England of sites for inclusion on the UK's UNESCO tentative list, and whether they will publish those assessments.

Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

DCMS and Historic England, as our statutory advisers on heritage, regularly discuss sites and places we know to be interested in UNESCO World Heritage status, and have previously met and written to representatives from UK Cluniac sites.

With the large number of UK World Heritage Sites and our commitment to supporting UNESCO’s ambition for a more globally balanced and representative World Heritage List, the UK Government does not currently have plans to consider additional sites for nomination to UNESCO, beyond those already included on the UK’s Tentative List.

No recent formal assessments have been made by Historic England of sites for inclusion on the UK’s Tentative List. Applications to the 2022/23 Tentative List Review were assessed by an independent expert panel and the Government response was published in July 2023.

Religious Buildings: Conservation
Asked by: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer)
Wednesday 17th September 2025

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will be participating in and engaging with the bid by the European Federation of Cluniac Sites for UNESCO World Heritage status of its sites, and whether they will ensure that relevant agencies are involved in the process.

Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

DCMS and Historic England, as our statutory advisers on heritage, regularly discuss sites and places we know to be interested in UNESCO World Heritage status, and have previously met and written to representatives from UK Cluniac sites.

With the large number of UK World Heritage Sites and our commitment to supporting UNESCO’s ambition for a more globally balanced and representative World Heritage List, the UK Government does not currently have plans to consider additional sites for nomination to UNESCO, beyond those already included on the UK’s Tentative List.

No recent formal assessments have been made by Historic England of sites for inclusion on the UK’s Tentative List. Applications to the 2022/23 Tentative List Review were assessed by an independent expert panel and the Government response was published in July 2023.

Religious Buildings: Conservation
Asked by: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer)
Wednesday 17th September 2025

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask His Majesty's Government what meetings and discussions they have had with Historic England regarding the bid by the European Federation of Cluniac Sites for UNESCO World Heritage Status of their network of European sites.

Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

DCMS and Historic England, as our statutory advisers on heritage, regularly discuss sites and places we know to be interested in UNESCO World Heritage status, and have previously met and written to representatives from UK Cluniac sites.

With the large number of UK World Heritage Sites and our commitment to supporting UNESCO’s ambition for a more globally balanced and representative World Heritage List, the UK Government does not currently have plans to consider additional sites for nomination to UNESCO, beyond those already included on the UK’s Tentative List.

No recent formal assessments have been made by Historic England of sites for inclusion on the UK’s Tentative List. Applications to the 2022/23 Tentative List Review were assessed by an independent expert panel and the Government response was published in July 2023.