Lord Bassam of Brighton Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Bassam of Brighton

Information between 12th November 2025 - 22nd November 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 169
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 195
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 151 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 66 Noes - 175
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 135
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 134 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 150
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bassam of Brighton voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150


Speeches
Lord Bassam of Brighton speeches from: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
Lord Bassam of Brighton contributed 1 speech (60 words)
Committee stage
Friday 14th November 2025 - Lords Chamber
Department of Health and Social Care


Written Answers
Heathrow Airport: Railways
Asked by: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer)
Thursday 20th November 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will ensure that access to Heathrow Airport from Surrey, Sussex and Hampshire are considered in any assessment of new rail links to the proposed third runway at Heathrow Airport.

Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport)

The Government recognises the vital role that surface access will play as part of any future expansion of Heathrow Airport. As part of the review of the Airports National Policy Statement (ANPS), launched on 22 October 2025, we will consider the transport infrastructure required to support a third runway, including rail connectivity and mode share targets. This will include considering the impacts for travellers from different regions.

The Government has been clear that expansion must be affordable and delivered in the best interest of passengers. Scheme costs should be minimised and financed through private funding, including any surface transport costs.

While it would not be appropriate to pre-empt the outcome of the ANPS review at this stage, it will be the responsibility of any expansion promoter to set out a surface access strategy demonstrating how they will meet the requirements set out in the ANPS.

Heathrow Airport: Railways
Asked by: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer)
Thursday 20th November 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will carry out an economic assessment, including a regional analysis, when evaluating rail access to Heathrow Airport as part of expansion proposals.

Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport)

The Government recognises the vital role that surface access will play as part of any future expansion of Heathrow Airport. As part of the review of the Airports National Policy Statement (ANPS), launched on 22 October 2025, we will consider the transport infrastructure required to support a third runway, including rail connectivity and mode share targets. This will include considering the impacts for travellers from different regions.

The Government has been clear that expansion must be affordable and delivered in the best interest of passengers. Scheme costs should be minimised and financed through private funding, including any surface transport costs.

While it would not be appropriate to pre-empt the outcome of the ANPS review at this stage, it will be the responsibility of any expansion promoter to set out a surface access strategy demonstrating how they will meet the requirements set out in the ANPS.

Heathrow Airport: Railways
Asked by: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour - Life peer)
Thursday 20th November 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will consider surface rail transportation benefits of a southern link to Heathrow when evaluating proposals for the expansion of Heathrow Airport.

Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport)

The Government recognises the vital role that surface access will play as part of any future expansion of Heathrow Airport. As part of the review of the Airports National Policy Statement (ANPS), launched on 22 October 2025, we will consider the transport infrastructure required to support a third runway, including rail connectivity and mode share targets. This will include considering the impacts for travellers from different regions.

The Government has been clear that expansion must be affordable and delivered in the best interest of passengers. Scheme costs should be minimised and financed through private funding, including any surface transport costs.

While it would not be appropriate to pre-empt the outcome of the ANPS review at this stage, it will be the responsibility of any expansion promoter to set out a surface access strategy demonstrating how they will meet the requirements set out in the ANPS.




Lord Bassam of Brighton mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Introduction: Lord Whitehead
1 speech (1 words)
Thursday 20th November 2025 - Lords Chamber

Mentions:
1: None in the City of Southampton, was introduced and made the solemn affirmation, supported by Lord Bassam of Brighton - Link to Speech