Lord Bailey of Paddington Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Bailey of Paddington

Information between 31st December 2025 - 20th January 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bailey of Paddington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 149 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 178
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bailey of Paddington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 131
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bailey of Paddington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 122 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 134 Noes - 185
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bailey of Paddington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 219
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bailey of Paddington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 136
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bailey of Paddington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 157 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 209
12 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bailey of Paddington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 169
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bailey of Paddington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 185 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 176
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Bailey of Paddington voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 178 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 211


Speeches
Lord Bailey of Paddington speeches from: Youth Guarantee Scheme: Evaluation
Lord Bailey of Paddington contributed 1 speech (43 words)
Tuesday 13th January 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Work and Pensions
Lord Bailey of Paddington speeches from: New Homes: Target
Lord Bailey of Paddington contributed 1 speech (68 words)
Thursday 8th January 2026 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Lord Bailey of Paddington speeches from: Broadcasting: Recent Developments
Lord Bailey of Paddington contributed 1 speech (782 words)
Thursday 8th January 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport


Written Answers
Prostate Cancer: Screening
Asked by: Lord Bailey of Paddington (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 5th January 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that the UK National Screening Committee's draft prostate cancer screening recommendation does not discourage testing among higher risk men, including black men and those with a family history, and that those men receive clear information to support informed decision-making; and whether they will ensure that those men can access a test if they request one.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (Wes Streeting MP) will consider the final recommendation of the UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) on screening for prostate cancer when it is received. At that point, he will decide on implementation, including any changes to guidance around testing that may be required.

It is anticipated that the final recommendation will be provided in early 2026 after the conclusion of a 12-week consultation which opened on 28 November 2025. This seeks views on an evidence review and a draft recommendation to:

  • offer a targeted national prostate cancer screening programme to men with confirmed BRCA1/2 gene variants every two years, from 45 years old to 61 years old;
  • not recommend population screening;
  • not recommend targeted screening of Black men;
  • not recommend targeted screening of men with family history; and
  • collaborate with the Transform trial team to answer outstanding questions on screening effectiveness for black men and men with a family history as soon as trial data becomes available, and await results of the study to develop and trial a more accurate test than PSA alone, to improve the balance of benefit and harm of screening.
Israeli Embassy: Police
Asked by: Lord Bailey of Paddington (Conservative - Life peer)
Friday 9th January 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to support police officers guarding the Israeli Embassy in London with their (1) working conditions, and (2) safety.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Government takes the protective security of diplomatic missions extremely seriously. The UK Government's protective security system is rigorous and proportionate. It is our longstanding policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements, as doing so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals' and sites' security.

More broadly in terms of the support available to police officers, through the Police Covenant the Home Office are supporting the police workforce with their physical and mental health.

Car Sharing: Greater London
Asked by: Lord Bailey of Paddington (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 13th January 2026

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask His Majesty's Government (1) what assessment they have made of the impact of Zipcar's closure on the London economy, and (2) what discussions they have had with the company owners.

Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport)

Transport in London is devolved to the Mayor of London and Transport for London (TfL).

The Minister for Local Transport met with the shared mobility industry in November, including Zipcar representatives, to discuss its challenges and opportunities and how Government can continue to best support the sector. The Department is actively considering what more can be done and is using feedback from the ministerial meeting and further stakeholder engagement to inform next steps.




Lord Bailey of Paddington mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Broadcasting: Recent Developments
60 speeches (21,549 words)
Thursday 8th January 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
Mentions:
1: Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con - Life peer) The noble Lords, Lord Razzall and Lord Hampton, and, very powerfully, my noble friend Lord Bailey of Paddington - Link to Speech
2: Baroness Twycross (Lab - Life peer) It was particularly helpful to have the perspective of the noble Lords, Lord Hampton and Lord Bailey of Paddington - Link to Speech




Lord Bailey of Paddington - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Tuesday 27th January 2026 10:30 a.m.
Built Environment Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 3rd March 2026 10:30 a.m.
Built Environment Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Friday 2nd January 2026
Written Evidence - Self employed, and Self employed
NTC0058 - New Towns: Creating Communities

New Towns: Creating Communities - Built Environment Committee
Friday 2nd January 2026
Written Evidence - School of Built environment, Oxford Brookes University
NTC0060 - New Towns: Creating Communities

New Towns: Creating Communities - Built Environment Committee
Friday 2nd January 2026
Written Evidence - University of Birmingham, Business School, University of Birmingham, Business School, University of Birmingham, Business School, and University of Birmingham, Business School
NTC0059 - New Towns: Creating Communities

New Towns: Creating Communities - Built Environment Committee
Friday 2nd January 2026
Written Evidence - University of Birmingham, Business School, University of Birmingham, Business School, University of Birmingham, Business School, and University of Birmingham, Business School
NTC0059 - New Towns: Creating Communities

New Towns: Creating Communities - Built Environment Committee
Wednesday 28th January 2026
Government Response - Government Response to the Committee's report "New Towns: Laying the Foundations"

Built Environment Committee
Wednesday 21st January 2026
Oral Evidence - Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, and Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government

New Towns: Creating Communities - Built Environment Committee
Monday 26th January 2026
Correspondence - Letter from Samantha Dixon MBE MP, Under-Secretary of State for Building Safety, Fire and Democracy, to Lord Gascoigne, Chairman of the Built Environment Committee. 17 December 2025

Built Environment Committee