Disabled Children: Sexual Exploitation

Debate between Lord Ashton of Hyde and Lord Bishop of Peterborough
Monday 7th September 2015

(9 years, 2 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Bishop of Peterborough Portrait The Lord Bishop of Peterborough
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, given that abused children often do not show symptoms for some years, and that children with learning disabilities tend to show symptoms in different ways that are not as easily recognised, does the Minister agree that all children who are subject to sexual harm prevention orders or sexual risk orders should receive assessment of their needs and therapeutic support even before signs or symptoms are shown?

Lord Ashton of Hyde Portrait Lord Ashton of Hyde
- Hansard - -

That is a very sensible suggestion. These symptoms take time to manifest themselves. However, we realise that people with special needs have needs which go on beyond the conventional age of adulthood. The relevant statutory guidance for young people with special educational needs and disabilities extends to the age of 25.

Low Pay: Resolution Foundation Report

Debate between Lord Ashton of Hyde and Lord Bishop of Peterborough
Tuesday 11th November 2014

(10 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Bishop of Peterborough Portrait The Lord Bishop of Peterborough
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, now that the economy is picking up, will the Minister comment on the living wage and on whether the Government believe that the minimum wage really is enough?

Lord Ashton of Hyde Portrait Lord Ashton of Hyde
- Hansard - -

The right reverend Prelate is right to bring this subject up. The minimum wage is a minimum as a catch-all; the Government support people and businesses paying above that, if they can pay the living wage, but only when it is affordable and not at the expense of jobs. In BIS, the department I represent, we have recently increased the pay of the lowest-paid workers in the department so that everyone receives the living wage. We support that as long as it is not at the expense of jobs.