Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom

Information between 2nd March 2025 - 1st April 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 187 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 151
26 Mar 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 165 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 238 Noes - 156
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 190 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 165
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 189 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 172
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 187 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 162
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 175 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 172
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 176 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 170 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 173
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 158 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 339
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 229
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 168 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 183 Noes - 234
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 167 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 237
4 Mar 2025 - Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 196 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 249
4 Mar 2025 - Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 197 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 248
4 Mar 2025 - Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 185 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 236
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 164 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 234
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 195 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 224 Noes - 267
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 186 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 257


Speeches
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom speeches from: Iranian State Threats
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom contributed 1 speech (43 words)
Thursday 6th March 2025 - Lords Chamber
Home Office


Written Answers
Government Controlled Companies: Prosecutions
Asked by: Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 27th March 2025

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether any entity owned or partially owned by the Government has acted as a prosecutor in its own interests in the past five years.

Answered by Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Certain Government agencies (such as the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency and TV Licencing) are permitted under legislation to bring criminal prosecutions within specified remits. In addition, where the UK taxpayer is a shareholder or the only shareholder, a company may bring a private prosecution using common law powers preserved under section 6(1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985.

The Government does not collate or record data on individual prosecutors and private prosecutions, although some prosecutors may publish their own data separately. This Government considers that the public should be given more information about private prosecutors to improve confidence in the criminal justice system. This is why we have launched a public consultation on options to improve the oversight and regulation of private prosecutors in the criminal justice system, which closes on 8 May.