Information between 15th April 2024 - 22nd October 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
22 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Anderson of Ipswich voted Aye and in line with the House One of 38 Crossbench Aye votes vs 11 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 211 |
17 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Anderson of Ipswich voted Aye and in line with the House One of 46 Crossbench Aye votes vs 1 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 208 |
17 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Anderson of Ipswich voted Aye and in line with the House One of 42 Crossbench Aye votes vs 1 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 195 |
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Anderson of Ipswich voted Aye and in line with the House One of 62 Crossbench Aye votes vs 4 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 218 |
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Anderson of Ipswich voted Aye and in line with the House One of 48 Crossbench Aye votes vs 14 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 236 |
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Anderson of Ipswich voted Aye and in line with the House One of 60 Crossbench Aye votes vs 8 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 227 |
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Anderson of Ipswich voted Aye and in line with the House One of 51 Crossbench Aye votes vs 11 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 233 |
21 May 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Anderson of Ipswich voted Aye and against the House One of 21 Crossbench Aye votes vs 4 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 192 |
21 May 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Anderson of Ipswich voted Aye and in line with the House One of 27 Crossbench Aye votes vs 2 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 198 |
21 May 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Anderson of Ipswich voted Aye and in line with the House One of 32 Crossbench Aye votes vs 1 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 208 |
Speeches |
---|
Lord Anderson of Ipswich speeches from: King’s Speech
Lord Anderson of Ipswich contributed 1 speech (834 words) Tuesday 23rd July 2024 - Lords Chamber Attorney General |
Lord Anderson of Ipswich speeches from: Data Protection and Digital Information Bill
Lord Anderson of Ipswich contributed 6 speeches (1,628 words) Committee stage Wednesday 24th April 2024 - Grand Committee Department for Science, Innovation & Technology |
Lord Anderson of Ipswich speeches from: Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill
Lord Anderson of Ipswich contributed 3 speeches (1,540 words) Consideration of Commons amendments Monday 22nd April 2024 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
Lord Anderson of Ipswich speeches from: Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill
Lord Anderson of Ipswich contributed 1 speech (358 words) Consideration of Commons amendments Monday 22nd April 2024 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
Lord Anderson of Ipswich speeches from: Data Protection and Digital Information Bill
Lord Anderson of Ipswich contributed 2 speeches (803 words) Committee stage Monday 15th April 2024 - Grand Committee Department for Science, Innovation & Technology |
Written Answers |
---|
National Archives
Asked by: Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench - Life peer) Tuesday 22nd October 2024 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government, who was responsible for (1) drafting, and (2) approving, The National Archives’ Re-closure Policy implemented as a result of sections 45 and 46 of the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010; and whether any consultation with external stakeholders took place. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The National Archives’ reclosure policy was first drafted by officials in The National Archives and approved by directors and the then Chief Executive and Keeper of Public Records in 2010. Following its inception, the reclosure policy has been kept under continuous review and amended several times, most notably in 2018 due to changes in data protection legislation. The National Archives’ Reclosure Panel provides internal expert scrutiny of the application of The National Archives’ reclosure policy. The Reclosure Panel is composed of members of staff with expertise in Freedom of Information (FOI) and Data Protection, along with records and catalogue specialists from across The National Archives. The Panel is chaired by the Director for Public Records Access and Government Services. On behalf of the Secretary of State, the Advisory Council on National Records and Archives provides external scrutiny of the Reclosure Panel’s decisions where qualified exemptions under the FOI Act 2000 are applied. The legal provisions underpinning public access to records held by The National Archives are section 5 of the Public Records Act 1958 and section 1 of the FOI Act 2000 (subject to any relevant exemptions stated elsewhere in the FOI Act). Under section 2(4) of the Public Records Act 1958, ‘the Keeper of Public Records shall have power to do all such things as appear to him necessary or expedient for maintaining the utility of the Public Record Office.’ When The National Archives are made aware that information in a record may fall within a relevant exemption under the FOI Act or the UKGDPR, the record is temporarily withdrawn from public access so that an assessment may take place. Whilst this assessment is taking place and subsequently, the statutory right of access to information under the FOI regime of any requestor is not affected. Therefore, an FOI request can still be made for any record that has an ‘Access Under Review’ status on The National Archives’ catalogue, Discovery. Reclosure decisions by The National Archives under the FOI Act are subject to review by the Information Commissioner and, ultimately, the courts. |
National Archives
Asked by: Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench - Life peer) Tuesday 22nd October 2024 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government how many times The National Archives’ Re-closure Policy has been reviewed since its inception; and by whom. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The National Archives’ reclosure policy was first drafted by officials in The National Archives and approved by directors and the then Chief Executive and Keeper of Public Records in 2010. Following its inception, the reclosure policy has been kept under continuous review and amended several times, most notably in 2018 due to changes in data protection legislation. The National Archives’ Reclosure Panel provides internal expert scrutiny of the application of The National Archives’ reclosure policy. The Reclosure Panel is composed of members of staff with expertise in Freedom of Information (FOI) and Data Protection, along with records and catalogue specialists from across The National Archives. The Panel is chaired by the Director for Public Records Access and Government Services. On behalf of the Secretary of State, the Advisory Council on National Records and Archives provides external scrutiny of the Reclosure Panel’s decisions where qualified exemptions under the FOI Act 2000 are applied. The legal provisions underpinning public access to records held by The National Archives are section 5 of the Public Records Act 1958 and section 1 of the FOI Act 2000 (subject to any relevant exemptions stated elsewhere in the FOI Act). Under section 2(4) of the Public Records Act 1958, ‘the Keeper of Public Records shall have power to do all such things as appear to him necessary or expedient for maintaining the utility of the Public Record Office.’ When The National Archives are made aware that information in a record may fall within a relevant exemption under the FOI Act or the UKGDPR, the record is temporarily withdrawn from public access so that an assessment may take place. Whilst this assessment is taking place and subsequently, the statutory right of access to information under the FOI regime of any requestor is not affected. Therefore, an FOI request can still be made for any record that has an ‘Access Under Review’ status on The National Archives’ catalogue, Discovery. Reclosure decisions by The National Archives under the FOI Act are subject to review by the Information Commissioner and, ultimately, the courts. |
National Archives
Asked by: Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench - Life peer) Tuesday 22nd October 2024 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government what is the legal basis for those provisions within The National Archives’ Re-closure Policy that allow for the retrospective application of exemptions to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to justify the re-closure of records that were previously open. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The National Archives’ reclosure policy was first drafted by officials in The National Archives and approved by directors and the then Chief Executive and Keeper of Public Records in 2010. Following its inception, the reclosure policy has been kept under continuous review and amended several times, most notably in 2018 due to changes in data protection legislation. The National Archives’ Reclosure Panel provides internal expert scrutiny of the application of The National Archives’ reclosure policy. The Reclosure Panel is composed of members of staff with expertise in Freedom of Information (FOI) and Data Protection, along with records and catalogue specialists from across The National Archives. The Panel is chaired by the Director for Public Records Access and Government Services. On behalf of the Secretary of State, the Advisory Council on National Records and Archives provides external scrutiny of the Reclosure Panel’s decisions where qualified exemptions under the FOI Act 2000 are applied. The legal provisions underpinning public access to records held by The National Archives are section 5 of the Public Records Act 1958 and section 1 of the FOI Act 2000 (subject to any relevant exemptions stated elsewhere in the FOI Act). Under section 2(4) of the Public Records Act 1958, ‘the Keeper of Public Records shall have power to do all such things as appear to him necessary or expedient for maintaining the utility of the Public Record Office.’ When The National Archives are made aware that information in a record may fall within a relevant exemption under the FOI Act or the UKGDPR, the record is temporarily withdrawn from public access so that an assessment may take place. Whilst this assessment is taking place and subsequently, the statutory right of access to information under the FOI regime of any requestor is not affected. Therefore, an FOI request can still be made for any record that has an ‘Access Under Review’ status on The National Archives’ catalogue, Discovery. Reclosure decisions by The National Archives under the FOI Act are subject to review by the Information Commissioner and, ultimately, the courts. |
National Archives
Asked by: Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench - Life peer) Tuesday 22nd October 2024 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government what processes are in place to ensure effective scrutiny of the operation of The National Archives Re-closure Policy. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The National Archives’ reclosure policy was first drafted by officials in The National Archives and approved by directors and the then Chief Executive and Keeper of Public Records in 2010. Following its inception, the reclosure policy has been kept under continuous review and amended several times, most notably in 2018 due to changes in data protection legislation. The National Archives’ Reclosure Panel provides internal expert scrutiny of the application of The National Archives’ reclosure policy. The Reclosure Panel is composed of members of staff with expertise in Freedom of Information (FOI) and Data Protection, along with records and catalogue specialists from across The National Archives. The Panel is chaired by the Director for Public Records Access and Government Services. On behalf of the Secretary of State, the Advisory Council on National Records and Archives provides external scrutiny of the Reclosure Panel’s decisions where qualified exemptions under the FOI Act 2000 are applied. The legal provisions underpinning public access to records held by The National Archives are section 5 of the Public Records Act 1958 and section 1 of the FOI Act 2000 (subject to any relevant exemptions stated elsewhere in the FOI Act). Under section 2(4) of the Public Records Act 1958, ‘the Keeper of Public Records shall have power to do all such things as appear to him necessary or expedient for maintaining the utility of the Public Record Office.’ When The National Archives are made aware that information in a record may fall within a relevant exemption under the FOI Act or the UKGDPR, the record is temporarily withdrawn from public access so that an assessment may take place. Whilst this assessment is taking place and subsequently, the statutory right of access to information under the FOI regime of any requestor is not affected. Therefore, an FOI request can still be made for any record that has an ‘Access Under Review’ status on The National Archives’ catalogue, Discovery. Reclosure decisions by The National Archives under the FOI Act are subject to review by the Information Commissioner and, ultimately, the courts. |
National Archives
Asked by: Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench - Life peer) Tuesday 22nd October 2024 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government what is the legal basis for those provisions within The National Archives Re-closure Policy that allow for the withdrawal of public access to open records on demand without The National Archives having established any of the exemptions to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 are engaged. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The National Archives’ reclosure policy was first drafted by officials in The National Archives and approved by directors and the then Chief Executive and Keeper of Public Records in 2010. Following its inception, the reclosure policy has been kept under continuous review and amended several times, most notably in 2018 due to changes in data protection legislation. The National Archives’ Reclosure Panel provides internal expert scrutiny of the application of The National Archives’ reclosure policy. The Reclosure Panel is composed of members of staff with expertise in Freedom of Information (FOI) and Data Protection, along with records and catalogue specialists from across The National Archives. The Panel is chaired by the Director for Public Records Access and Government Services. On behalf of the Secretary of State, the Advisory Council on National Records and Archives provides external scrutiny of the Reclosure Panel’s decisions where qualified exemptions under the FOI Act 2000 are applied. The legal provisions underpinning public access to records held by The National Archives are section 5 of the Public Records Act 1958 and section 1 of the FOI Act 2000 (subject to any relevant exemptions stated elsewhere in the FOI Act). Under section 2(4) of the Public Records Act 1958, ‘the Keeper of Public Records shall have power to do all such things as appear to him necessary or expedient for maintaining the utility of the Public Record Office.’ When The National Archives are made aware that information in a record may fall within a relevant exemption under the FOI Act or the UKGDPR, the record is temporarily withdrawn from public access so that an assessment may take place. Whilst this assessment is taking place and subsequently, the statutory right of access to information under the FOI regime of any requestor is not affected. Therefore, an FOI request can still be made for any record that has an ‘Access Under Review’ status on The National Archives’ catalogue, Discovery. Reclosure decisions by The National Archives under the FOI Act are subject to review by the Information Commissioner and, ultimately, the courts. |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
King’s Speech
78 speeches (31,079 words) Tuesday 23rd July 2024 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Lord Khan of Burnley (Lab - Life peer) He talked about the end of skeleton Bills, as did the noble Lord, Lord Anderson of Ipswich. - Link to Speech |
Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill
29 speeches (3,941 words) Consideration of Lords messageConsideration of Lords Message Monday 22nd April 2024 - Commons Chamber Mentions: 1: Michael Tomlinson (Con - Mid Dorset and North Poole) The amendment is not necessary.Turning to the amendment from the noble Lord Anderson of Ipswich, I will - Link to Speech |
Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill
28 speeches (9,476 words) Consideration of Commons amendments Monday 22nd April 2024 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Con - Life peer) My Lords, I want to say a few words after the bravura performances from the noble Lords, Lord Anderson - Link to Speech |
Data Protection and Digital Information Bill
151 speeches (27,692 words) Committee stage Monday 22nd April 2024 - Grand Committee Department for Work and Pensions Mentions: 1: Baroness Chakrabarti (Lab - Life peer) lawyers—have long understood.Further, and in reference to the remarks attributed to the noble Lord, Lord - Link to Speech 2: Viscount Younger of Leckie (Con - Excepted Hereditary) the stand part notice from the noble Baronesses, Lady Kidron and Lady Chakrabarti, the noble Lord, Lord - Link to Speech |
Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill
14 speeches (3,074 words) Consideration of Commons amendments Monday 22nd April 2024 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer) The noble Lord, Lord Anderson of Ipswich, earlier today said:“Its costs will be measured not only in - Link to Speech |
Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill
71 speeches (11,123 words) Consideration of Commons amendmentsLords Handsard Tuesday 16th April 2024 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Baroness Chakrabarti (Lab - Life peer) It therefore incorporates the earlier work of the noble Lord, Lord Anderson of Ipswich. - Link to Speech |
Bill Documents |
---|
Apr. 23 2024
HL Bill 30-VII Seventh marshalled list for Grand Committee Data Protection and Digital Information Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: BARONESS KIDRON BARONESS CHAKRABARTI LORD ANDERSON OF IPSWICH LORD KAMALL _ The above-named |
Apr. 22 2024
HL Bill 65-I Marshalled list for Consideration of Commons Reasons Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Act 2024 Amendment Paper Found: A1★_ Lord Anderson of Ipswich to move, as an amendment to Motion A, at end insert “, and do propose |
Apr. 22 2024
HL Bill 65-I Marshalled list for Consideration of Commons Reasons Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Act 2024 Amendment Paper Found: A1★_ Lord Anderson of Ipswich to move, as an amendment to Motion A, at end insert “, and do propose |
Apr. 22 2024
HL Bill 65-I Marshalled list for Consideration of Commons Reasons Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Act 2024 Amendment Paper Found: A1★_ Lord Anderson of Ipswich to move, as an amendment to Motion A, at end insert “, and do propose |
Apr. 22 2024
HL Bill 65-I Marshalled list for Consideration of Commons Reasons Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Act 2024 Amendment Paper Found: A1★_ Lord Anderson of Ipswich to move, as an amendment to Motion A, at end insert “, and do propose |
Apr. 18 2024
HL Bill 30-VI Sixth marshalled list for Grand Committee Data Protection and Digital Information Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: Data Protection and Digital Information Bill 10 Clause 128 BARONESS KIDRON LORD ANDERSON OF |
Apr. 16 2024
HL Bill 30-V Fifth marshalled list for Grand Committee Data Protection and Digital Information Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: nature targets. 35 Data Protection and Digital Information Bill Clause 128 BARONESS KIDRON LORD |
Apr. 16 2024
HL Bill 30-V Fifth marshalled list for Grand Committee Data Protection and Digital Information Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: nature targets. 35 Data Protection and Digital Information Bill Clause 128 BARONESS KIDRON LORD |
Department Publications - News and Communications |
---|
Thursday 25th April 2024
Home Office Source Page: Investigatory powers enhanced to keep people safer Document: Investigatory powers enhanced to keep people safer (webpage) Found: existing regime to ensure that it remains fit-for-purpose following an independent review of the law by Lord |
Deposited Papers |
---|
Friday 2nd August 2024
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Source Page: Letter dated 29/07/2024 from Lord Khan of Burnley to Lord Anderson of Ipswich and others regarding questions raised during the King's Speech debate on the constitution and devolution: legislation relating to the Prime Minister’s Independent Adviser for Ministerial Interests, the Public Appointments Commission and ACOBA, Skeleton Bills and legislation, the Bennett Institute report on the Review of the UK Constitution. 2p. Document: 2024.07.29_Lord_Anderson_follow_up_letter.pdf (PDF) Found: Letter dated 29/07/2024 from Lord Khan of Burnley to Lord Anderson of Ipswich and others regarding questions |
Calendar |
---|
Wednesday 24th April 2024 10 a.m. Constitution Committee - Private Meeting Subject: The Governance of the Union: Consultation, Co-operation and Legislative Consent View calendar |
Wednesday 1st May 2024 10 a.m. Constitution Committee - Private Meeting View calendar |
Wednesday 1st May 2024 10 a.m. Constitution Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The Governance of the Union: Consultation, Co-operation and Legislative Consent At 10:15am: Oral evidence The Rt Hon the Lord Reed of Allermuir - President at The Supreme Court The Rt Hon Lord Hodge - Deputy President at The Supreme Court View calendar |
Tuesday 14th May 2024 11:30 a.m. Constitution Committee - Private Meeting Subject: The Governance of the Union: Consultation, Co-operation and Legislative Consent View calendar |
Tuesday 14th May 2024 3:30 p.m. Constitution Committee - Private Meeting Subject: The Governance of the Union: Consultation, Co-operation and Legislative Consent View calendar |
Wednesday 15th May 2024 10 a.m. Constitution Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The Governance of the Union: Consultation, Co-operation and Legislative Consent View calendar |
Wednesday 8th May 2024 midnight Constitution Committee - Private Meeting View calendar |
Wednesday 8th May 2024 10 a.m. Constitution Committee - Private Meeting View calendar |
Wednesday 22nd May 2024 10 a.m. Constitution Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The Governance of the Union: Consultation, Co-operation and Legislative Consent View calendar |
Wednesday 5th June 2024 10 a.m. Constitution Committee - Private Meeting View calendar |
Wednesday 5th June 2024 10 a.m. Constitution Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Annual evidence session for Lady Chief Justice 2023-24 At 10:15am: Oral evidence The Rt Hon Baroness Carr of Walton-on-the-Hill - Lady Chief Justice at the Judiciary of England and Wales View calendar |
Wednesday 4th September 2024 10 a.m. Constitution Committee - Private Meeting View calendar |
Wednesday 11th September 2024 10 a.m. Constitution Committee - Private Meeting View calendar |
Wednesday 16th October 2024 10 a.m. Constitution Committee - Private Meeting View calendar |
Wednesday 13th November 2024 10 a.m. Constitution Committee - Private discussion Subject: Executive oversight and responsibility for the UK Constitution View calendar |
Wednesday 6th November 2024 10 a.m. Constitution Committee - Private Meeting Subject: Executive oversight and responsibility for the UK Constitution View calendar |
Select Committee Inquiry |
---|
17 Oct 2024
Executive oversight and responsibility for the UK Constitution’ Constitution Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Responsibility for specific areas of the constitution is spread broadly across government and roles are often overlapping. The Committee is conducting a short inquiry into where executive responsibility for the UK constitution as a whole lies within the new Government, with a focus on how responsible ministers are to work effectively together to ensure a common understanding of the integrity of the UK constitution. |