Draft Construction Products (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019

Debate between Kit Malthouse and Mark Prisk
Monday 4th February 2019

(5 years, 9 months ago)

General Committees
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Kit Malthouse Portrait Kit Malthouse
- Hansard - -

As I said in my opening remarks, the instrument has been before the House since 18 December. It has been perfectly possible for Members to investigate it and to seek those documents for the past month and a half. If the hon. Lady has failed to do so, that is not our lookout.

Mark Prisk Portrait Mr Mark Prisk (Hertford and Stortford) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Minister may not recall, but during the long period of the Labour Government, when I was in opposition, there were numerous occasions on which not only amendments or documents were not present—

--- Later in debate ---
Mark Prisk Portrait Mr Prisk
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My question—which I am trying to ask without interruption from the Opposition—is this. Does the Minister agree that the fact that this instrument has been tabled since before Christmas, and that Opposition Members have not taken the opportunity to do anything about it, suggests that their anger today is somewhat synthetic?

Kit Malthouse Portrait Kit Malthouse
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend has put his finger on the button. From the start of this sitting, it has been obvious that all this is not really about the EU construction products regulation; it is about a rejection of the whole process of properly preparing the country for all eventualities. I know that the hon. Member for Garston and Halewood regards herself as an assiduous Member of Parliament, but I am afraid that I cannot compensate for her dilatory approach to these regulations by producing a paper that she has had well over a month to look at and research.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Kit Malthouse and Mark Prisk
Monday 5th November 2018

(6 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Mark Prisk Portrait Mr Mark Prisk (Hertford and Stortford) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

6. What progress he has made on improving standards in the management of residential property in the (a) private rented and (b) social housing sectors. [R]

Kit Malthouse Portrait The Minister for Housing (Kit Malthouse)
- Hansard - -

All tenants deserve a safe and decent place to live. In respect of the private rented sector, Lord Best is chairing a new working group on property agent regulation, and we have extended mandatory licensing. The social housing Green Paper contains proposals to drive up the performance of social landlords in delivering a good service.

Mark Prisk Portrait Mr Prisk
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I welcome the reforms, especially the requirement for all residential managers to be trained and qualified. That is the way to raise standards. However, there are concerns about how the requirement may be introduced. Will the Minister agree to a meeting to discuss how existing qualifications will be accredited by the proposed mandatory qualifications, so that we do not end up worsening the current shortage of competent managers?

Kit Malthouse Portrait Kit Malthouse
- Hansard - -

With his usual accuracy, my hon. Friend identifies an issue critical to getting this matter right. As he knows, the working group will be looking at the entire property agent sector to ensure that any new regulatory framework is joined up across letting, property management and estate agents. One of the key issues in making that new regulatory framework land will be the transition from the old to new, and I will be more than happy—indeed it would be foolish of me not to agree—to meet a former Housing Minister of such standing.