Debates between Kirsty Blackman and Leo Docherty during the 2017-2019 Parliament

Mon 19th Nov 2018
Finance (No. 3) Bill
Commons Chamber

Committee: 1st sitting: House of Commons
Mon 12th Nov 2018
Finance (No. 3) Bill
Commons Chamber

2nd reading: House of Commons & Programme motion: House of Commons

Finance (No. 3) Bill

Debate between Kirsty Blackman and Leo Docherty
Leo Docherty Portrait Leo Docherty
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

This is not a debate on universal credit. This is actually about job creation. That is the more important point when it comes to entrepreneurs’ relief.

Kirsty Blackman Portrait Kirsty Blackman
- Hansard - -

New clauses 3 and 7 both ask the Government to say exactly what the effect of entrepreneurs’ relief will be. Does the hon. Gentleman agree that it would be best for reliefs to be targeted to ensure that the most jobs are created, the most people benefit and the most businesses can grow as a result of the changes? Does he therefore agree that it would be good for the Government to explain why their proposal is better than any other proposals?

Finance (No. 3) Bill

Debate between Kirsty Blackman and Leo Docherty
2nd reading: House of Commons & Programme motion: House of Commons
Monday 12th November 2018

(6 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Finance Act 2019 View all Finance Act 2019 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Kirsty Blackman Portrait Kirsty Blackman
- Hansard - -

The sooner that deal can be announced and that commitment can be made by the UK Government, the better for the industry. Confidence is still shoogly just now, and although that confidence is rebuilding, we need clear commitments for the industry and the clear support of the UK Government so that the industry feels more secure and takes decisions on investment and exploration. That is why signing a sector deal as soon as possible would be hugely appreciated.

More generally, one of the things that infuriates and frustrates me about this UK Government particularly is that they think that if they stand up and invent a new definition for something, it will immediately become true. They have decided that if they say “living wage” instead of “minimum wage”, people will actually be able to live on it. That is not how it works. People still cannot live on it, even if the Government call it a living wage, and that is especially the case for the under-25s, who are not eligible for the living wage. It does not cost someone who is 24 less to live than someone who is 25. The Government need to get rid of those differential rates.

The UK Government say that they have ended austerity. By anyone else’s definition, they have not ended austerity. Just because they say, “We’ve ended austerity,” it does not mean that they have actually ended austerity. There are still cuts to Government Departments. There is still the benefits freeze. We still have all those issues.

Leo Docherty Portrait Leo Docherty
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the hon. Lady give way?

Kirsty Blackman Portrait Kirsty Blackman
- Hansard - -

Not just now. In terms of the economic growth forecasts that the OBR has apparently made—