Local Government Finance Settlement Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Beamish

Main Page: Lord Beamish (Labour - Life peer)

Local Government Finance Settlement

Lord Beamish Excerpts
Tuesday 19th December 2017

(6 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Sajid Javid Portrait Sajid Javid
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

First, I join my hon. Friend in congratulating East Sussex on its approach to the challenges it faces, including on social care. It is a great place to retire, which leads to changing demographics. That is one of the things that will be looked at by the Green Paper we will publish next summer.

Lord Beamish Portrait Mr Kevan Jones (North Durham) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

On the formula for transitional funding, what consideration is given to the percentage of core spending a council derives from revenue support grant? In Durham’s case it is 14.3%, whereas in Surrey’s it is 3.5%. That meant that last year core spending in Durham fell by 1.2%, whereas in Surrey the figure was 0.1%.

Sajid Javid Portrait Sajid Javid
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman will know that for various reasons, over a number of years, councils have had a different proportion of central grant versus funds that are raised locally, for example through business rates. It is important to take that into account for all councils. What really matters is their core spending power: all the sources of spending power they have. He will be pleased to know that with today’s proposal there will be an increase for Durham of £5.6 million, which is 1.4%.