Debates between Judith Cummins and Mark Francois during the 2024 Parliament

Service Accommodation

Debate between Judith Cummins and Mark Francois
Thursday 19th December 2024

(5 days, 12 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Judith Cummins Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - -

I call the shadow Minister.

Mark Francois Portrait Mr Mark Francois (Rayleigh and Wickford) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

For the record, I declare an interest: I participated in the inquiry while serving on the Committee in the previous Parliament. I thank the Committee Chairman for kindly pointing that out. Also for the record, we welcome the Annington decision, partly because we had done a lot of work on that prior to the election. I thank the Minister for playing fair on that.

Now that we have hopefully resolved the issue of the ownership of the estate, there is still the question of its management. Changing the ownership does not fix the boiler. Will the Chairman of the Committee be pleased to hear that, in the same bipartisan spirit, we are happy to work with the Department and Ministers to see if we can provide proposals for improving the management of the estate now that, hopefully, we have resolved the ownership question?

Building Homes

Debate between Judith Cummins and Mark Francois
Tuesday 30th July 2024

(4 months, 3 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Mark Francois Portrait Mr Mark Francois (Rayleigh and Wickford) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker, and good luck in your new role.

It is possible to have successful development, but from experience it has to be something done with people and not to people. This policy is the latter. These pernicious top-down targets have the practical effect at ground level of setting one town against another, one village against another and one local community against another; and given the Chancellor’s statement on public spending yesterday, who will pay for the tens of billions of pounds-worth of infrastructure that would be required to make all this work? All experience shows that, on development and house building, the man or woman in Whitehall really does not know best. Why then, is the Secretary of State going back to the old, failed way of doing it, which will not work?