Debates between Jim McMahon and Ian Mearns during the 2017-2019 Parliament

Tue 19th Dec 2017
Finance (No. 2) Bill
Commons Chamber

Committee: 2nd sitting: House of Commons

Finance (No. 2) Bill

Debate between Jim McMahon and Ian Mearns
Jim McMahon Portrait Jim McMahon
- Hansard - -

Well, well, well. When it comes to naivety, there is a very fine line; it can often be endearing before it eventually becomes quite offensive. And I did find the speech of the hon. Member for Hitchin and Harpenden (Bim Afolami) offensive. It began in the spirit of naivety. I could see that he was nervous at the beginning of his contribution—quite rightly, it turned out, towards the end—because he did not have the data that was being presented.

The debate went on and Labour Members presented the data, but rather than actually taking account of it, the hon. Gentleman continued, in a very odd way, to try to defend what most reasonable people would say is a quite indefensible position. He was essentially saying, “Listen—if men are doing okay, surely women will eventually do okay too.” I am not sure whether the solution he came up with to the shareholder conundrum was for women to find wealthy husbands who are shareholders, as if that might somehow lift them out of poverty and allow them to be the beneficiaries of the cuts in corporation tax.

Ian Mearns Portrait Ian Mearns
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We have discovered a new phenomenon: it is called trickle-down gendernomics. It is going to be the resolution to all the problems of poverty and the disparity in earnings between men and women in all our communities up and down the country—I don’t think so.

Jim McMahon Portrait Jim McMahon
- Hansard - -

That is a fair point.