Information between 1st February 2026 - 11th February 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 3rd February 2026 Department for Work and Pensions Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour - Life peer) Legislation - Main Chamber Subject: Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - report stage (day 5) part two Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill 2024-26 View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Smith of Malvern voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 140 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Smith of Malvern voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 125 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 132 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Smith of Malvern voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 36 Noes - 144 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Smith of Malvern voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 166 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 180 |
|
4 Feb 2026 - Public Order Act 2023 (Interference With Use or Operation of Key National Infrastructure) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Baroness Smith of Malvern voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 165 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 62 Noes - 295 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Smith of Malvern voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 173 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 251 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Smith of Malvern voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 169 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 258 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Smith of Malvern speeches from: Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
Baroness Smith of Malvern contributed 9 speeches (1,196 words) Monday 9th February 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
Baroness Smith of Malvern speeches from: Youth Unemployment
Baroness Smith of Malvern contributed 9 speeches (882 words) Thursday 5th February 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
Baroness Smith of Malvern speeches from: Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
Baroness Smith of Malvern contributed 6 speeches (1,858 words) Tuesday 3rd February 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
Baroness Smith of Malvern speeches from: Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
Baroness Smith of Malvern contributed 13 speeches (5,520 words) Tuesday 3rd February 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
3 Feb 2026, 5:24 p.m. - House of Lords "The Baroness Smith of Malvern. " Division - View Video - View Transcript |
|
9 Feb 2026, 3:48 p.m. - House of Lords ">> Third Reading of the children's. >> Well-Being and schools Bill, the Baroness Smith of Malvern. >> My Lords, before the formal Third Reading of the Children's " Legislation: Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill –third reading - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Place-based Employment Support Programmes
31 speeches (8,958 words) Tuesday 10th February 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Work and Pensions |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Childcare
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 9th February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Smith of Malvern on 5 January (HL13131), when they expect to be in a position to share more information on the planned review of childcare provision. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The Childcare Review is currently in the early stages of cross government discussions to consider how the early education and childcare alongside family support works for families and children. We will also be working with stakeholders throughout the year to gather insights and build our evidence base. We aim to conclude the Review later this year. |
|
Training and Vocational Education
Asked by: Lord Bishop of Sheffield (Bishops - Bishops) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Smith of Malvern on 16 September 2025 (UIN HL10060), what plans they have to amend the International Education Strategy; and what the anticipated timeline for the publication of a revised strategy is. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The government’s International Education Strategy (IES) was launched on 20 January 2026. The strategy backs UK providers at all levels to expand overseas, strengthening global partnerships and giving millions more students access to a world-class UK education on their doorstep, all whilst boosting growth at home. It sets a clear ambition to grow the value of education exports to £40 billion a year by 2030. We want to increase the UK’s international standing through education and make the UK the global partner of choice at every stage of learning. The IES is now co-owned between the Department for Education, the Department for Business and Trade and the Foreign and Commonwealth Development Office.
|
|
Women: Public Places
Asked by: Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Baroness Smith of Malvern on 19 January (HL Deb col 5), what steps they expect public and private bodies to take to review their policies in line with the For Women Scotland Supreme Court judgement before the publication of the updated Code of Practice for Services, Public Functions and Associations; and what assessment they have made of potential (1) legal costs, and (2) inconsistences in legal advice, arising from the review of policies before the publication of that code of practice. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) We have always been clear that we support the For Women Scotland ruling, and the protection of single-sex spaces based on biological sex.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission - as the independent regulator - has submitted a draft Code of Practice for Services, Public Functions and Associations to Ministers, and we are working as quickly as we can to review it with the care it deserves. This will provide further guidance to duty bearers on how they should comply with the Equality Act 2010 following the Supreme Court ruling.
In the meantime, we expect duty bearers to implement the ruling and seek specialist legal advice where necessary.
It is for duty bearers to determine the most suitable procedures for reviewing their policies. |
|
Gender Recognition Certificates: Offenders
Asked by: Baroness Maclean of Redditch (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Smith of Malvern on 20 November 2025 (HL12179), what are the "significant safeguards" that prevent a sex offender from obtaining a gender recognition certificate. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) Each application for a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) is independently evaluated by the Gender Recognition Panel, underpinned by a range of required evidence. Certificates are only granted to those who meet the criteria, and not everyone who applies is granted one and circumstances are taken into account.
In order to be granted a GRC, an applicant must meet a high threshold of requirements:
There are safeguards in place to ensure that the relevant authorities can manage the risk posed by sex offenders. These include a requirement for registered sex offenders to notify the police of any changes to their personal information such as change of name. Furthermore, as previously stated, the police can require registered sex offenders to notify them of an intended change of name at least seven days in advance of using it. If a person with any criminal record were to obtain a GRC, this would not remove or invalidate past sentences served in their previous gender.
We continue to monitor these arrangements to ensure they safeguard the public. |