All 2 Debates between Lord Bellingham and Tom Tugendhat

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lord Bellingham and Tom Tugendhat
Wednesday 12th September 2018

(5 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Bellingham Portrait Sir Henry Bellingham (North West Norfolk) (Con)
- Hansard - -

6. Whether he has made an assessment of the operation of recent voter ID pilots; and if he will make a statement.

Tom Tugendhat Portrait Tom Tugendhat (Tonbridge and Malling) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

10. Whether he has made an assessment of the operation of recent voter ID pilots; and if he will make a statement.

Chloe Smith Portrait The Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office (Chloe Smith)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Cabinet Office and the independent Electoral Commission published their respective findings in July that the pilots worked well. The overwhelming majority of people were able to cast their vote without a problem, and there was no notable adverse effect on turnout. The success of the pilots proves that the measures are reasonable and proportionate.

Armed Forces: Historical Cases

Debate between Lord Bellingham and Tom Tugendhat
Thursday 23rd February 2017

(7 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Bellingham Portrait Sir Henry Bellingham
- Hansard - -

I absolutely agree with the hon. Gentleman and I will come on to that in a moment.

The key point about the Hutchings case is that it was fully investigated at the time. It was looked at by every available authority and organisation, and closed down at the time. Reopening cases now is revisionism. It is an attempt to rewrite history. It is trying to look at what happened then through the lens of 2017, when we have a whole new emphasis on human rights and different standards. It is perverse, wrong and completely unacceptable.

Tom Tugendhat Portrait Tom Tugendhat
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend makes a very good point, which complements entirely the one made by the hon. Member for South Down (Ms Ritchie). She is absolutely right that we have to move on, but in moving on we have to allow those who have served to move on. In a case like this, where it is so obvious and so clear that justice has not only been done but been seen to be done multiple times, surely the moving on can be done actively.

Lord Bellingham Portrait Sir Henry Bellingham
- Hansard - -

Let us look at what happened to the IRA and the paramilitaries. Their sole aim was to murder, maim and kill, and to disrupt communities. They did not investigate their own crimes and murders. They celebrated the killings they took part in. They were not subject to the Geneva convention or any other rule of law—or the British law on torture.

What about Captain Robert Nairac, the military intelligence liaison officer, who was abducted in County Armagh in May 1977? He was brutally tortured and killed. He was posthumously awarded the George Cross. He is one of nine IRA victims whose body has never been recovered. What about Corporal David Howes and Corporal Derek Woods, who chanced on an IRA funeral in March 1988? They were dragged out of their car, tortured and murdered. One of the most extraordinary pictures from the troubles is that one of Father Alec Reid administering the last rites to those two corporals. What about the Free Scottish privates who were abducted from a pub in 1971? They were off duty and unarmed; they were abducted and tortured, and no one has ever been convicted.