Local Government Finance

Debate between Baroness Laing of Elderslie and Gareth Snell
Wednesday 7th February 2018

(6 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Gareth Snell Portrait Gareth Snell (Stoke-on-Trent Central) (Lab/Co-op)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Conservative portfolio holder for finance on Stoke-on-Trent City Council says that it will lose £15 million of central Government grant over the next two years—that is Stoke-on-Trent with hyphens for the Secretary of State’s PPS, as he diligently searches his folder—but the Secretary of State will tell me that our revenue spending will be going up. Who is not telling me the truth? It cannot be the case that spending is going up when the portfolio holder tells me that the grant is being cut.

Baroness Laing of Elderslie Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Mrs Eleanor Laing)
- Hansard - -

Order. Before the Secretary of State answers, I must say that interventions have to be short. A lot of people want to speak. What is unfair is if people make interventions and then leave, and other people have to sit for three hours waiting to speak. That is just not honourable. I appreciate that the hon. Gentleman is going to be here, but I just make the point about short interventions.

Representation of the People (Young People’s Enfranchisement and Education) Bill

Debate between Baroness Laing of Elderslie and Gareth Snell
Friday 3rd November 2017

(7 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Laing of Elderslie Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Mrs Eleanor Laing)
- Hansard - -

Order. This is not acceptable. If the person who has the Floor cannot hear an intervention from someone on the other side of the House, then, de facto, there is something wrong in this Chamber and people must be quiet so that we can debate properly. Would the hon. Gentleman like to remake his intervention?

Gareth Snell Portrait Gareth Snell
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think, Madam Deputy Speaker, that the hon. Lady already understands my point. As somebody aged 70 can no longer serve on a jury, I am suggesting that, according to her argument, she might want to consider reducing the franchise.