Information between 12th April 2024 - 8th December 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Earl Peel voted No and against the House One of 5 Crossbench No votes vs 25 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 192 |
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Earl Peel voted No and against the House One of 6 Crossbench No votes vs 25 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 192 |
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Earl Peel voted No and in line with the House One of 14 Crossbench No votes vs 16 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 211 |
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Earl Peel voted No and against the House One of 4 Crossbench No votes vs 62 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 218 |
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Earl Peel voted No and against the House One of 14 Crossbench No votes vs 48 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 236 |
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Earl Peel voted No and against the House One of 8 Crossbench No votes vs 60 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 227 |
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Earl Peel voted No and against the House One of 11 Crossbench No votes vs 51 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 233 |
4 Nov 2024 - Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Earl Peel voted Aye and in line with the House One of 21 Crossbench Aye votes vs 10 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 125 |
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Earl Peel voted Aye and in line with the House One of 34 Crossbench Aye votes vs 6 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 139 |
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Earl Peel voted Aye and against the House One of 12 Crossbench Aye votes vs 30 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 226 |
6 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Earl Peel voted Aye and against the House One of 7 Crossbench Aye votes vs 12 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 124 |
6 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Earl Peel voted Aye and against the House One of 7 Crossbench Aye votes vs 14 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 138 |
20 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Earl Peel voted Aye and against the House One of 8 Crossbench Aye votes vs 30 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 213 |
Speeches |
---|
Earl Peel speeches from: Crown Estate Bill [HL]
Earl Peel contributed 1 speech (136 words) Report stage Tuesday 5th November 2024 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury |
Written Answers |
---|
Bracken: Weed Control
Asked by: Earl Peel (Crossbench - Excepted Hereditary) Tuesday 12th November 2024 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to prevent the spread, and ensure large-scale control, of bracken to protect the biodiversity of (1) sites of special scientific interest, and (2) other vulnerable areas. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Bracken is a native species, a natural component of many habitats, and supports several scarce and declining animal species. It is not regarded as a key threat to most habitats and species, but in some localities expansion of dense bracken is a threat to lowland heath, grasslands, habitats with scattered trees, scrub woodland and wood pasture. In such places management may be needed to limit the extent of dense bracken.
Countryside Stewardship supports the control of bracken in two principal ways: through a capital grant for chemical control of bracken; and as a supplement for removal, which can be applied for alongside suitable land management options. Controlling the presence or spread of bracken can maintain or restore biodiversity value, including of SSSIs, and help protect archaeological sites. |