All 1 Debates between Earl of Caithness and Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market

Share Page

House of Lords Reform Bill [HL]

Debate between Earl of Caithness and Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market
Friday 21st October 2011

(12 years, 7 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Share Debate
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Colwyn Portrait The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Colwyn)
- Hansard -
- - Excerpts

My Lords, in one briefing the two amendments are grouped together and in another they are separate. Is it your Lordships’ pleasure that the amendment be agreed to?

Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market Portrait Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market
- Hansard -
- - Excerpts

The amendment says “under section” but there is no section. Therefore, it falls if Amendment 128 is not agreed to.

Earl of Caithness Portrait The Earl of Caithness
- Hansard -
-

My Lords, I apologise. I am absolutely certain that my noble friend Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market is right. This shows the slight confusion that we are in as a result of the earlier Motion. Therefore, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.

Return to start of debate - Return to top of page