House of Lords Reform Bill [HL]
Debate between Earl of Caithness and Lord Colwyn
Friday 21st October 2011
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
(13 years, 2 months ago)
Lords ChamberRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
The Earl of Caithness
No, my Lords, it is not consequential on Amendment 128. I did not accept the groupings. I did not group Amendment 129 with Amendment 128 and I did not speak to it earlier. So I am moving it now and I am perfectly entitled to do so.
The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Colwyn)
My Lords, in one briefing the two amendments are grouped together and in another they are separate. Is it your Lordships’ pleasure that the amendment be agreed to?
Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market
The amendment says “under section” but there is no section. Therefore, it falls if Amendment 128 is not agreed to.