Information between 29th October 2024 - 7th January 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
4 Nov 2024 - Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Earl Attlee voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 125 |
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Earl Attlee voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 172 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 226 |
6 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Earl Attlee voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 127 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 132 |
6 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Earl Attlee voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 130 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 128 |
20 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Earl Attlee voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 184 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 213 |
Speeches |
---|
Earl Attlee speeches from: Defence: 2.5% GDP Spending Commitment
Earl Attlee contributed 1 speech (19 words) Tuesday 17th December 2024 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Defence |
Earl Attlee speeches from: Anti-social Behaviour and Shoplifting
Earl Attlee contributed 1 speech (35 words) Monday 16th December 2024 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
Earl Attlee speeches from: Undersea Cables
Earl Attlee contributed 1 speech (9 words) Tuesday 3rd December 2024 - Lords Chamber Department for Science, Innovation & Technology |
Earl Attlee speeches from: House of Lords Reform
Earl Attlee contributed 1 speech (673 words) Tuesday 12th November 2024 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House |
Earl Attlee speeches from: Gypsy and Traveller Communities: Accommodation
Earl Attlee contributed 1 speech (24 words) Wednesday 6th November 2024 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
Earl Attlee speeches from: Defence Policy: Deterrence
Earl Attlee contributed 1 speech (483 words) Thursday 31st October 2024 - Grand Committee Ministry of Defence |
Earl Attlee speeches from: Defence Spending
Earl Attlee contributed 1 speech (315 words) Thursday 31st October 2024 - Grand Committee Ministry of Defence |
Earl Attlee speeches from: Vehicle Drivers (Certificates of Professional Competence) (Amendment) Regulations 2024
Earl Attlee contributed 1 speech (514 words) Tuesday 29th October 2024 - Lords Chamber Department for Transport |
Written Answers |
---|
Great British Railways
Asked by: Earl Attlee (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary) Tuesday 5th November 2024 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government how their proposed Great British Railways organisation will differ from the Strategic Rail Authority that was abolished in 2006. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) The Strategic Rail Authority (SRA) did not integrate track and train, nor was it intended to. Great British Railways will integrate track and train at a route and operating company level, thus reducing costs, increasing revenue and improving performance, thus serving passengers, freight and the taxpayer.
|
Materials Handling Equipment: Licensing
Asked by: Earl Attlee (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary) Thursday 28th November 2024 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment, if any, they have made of requiring operators of mobile cranes to be licensed in a similar way to those licensed under the Goods Vehicles Licensing of Operators Act 1995. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) Mobile cranes mounted on an HGV chassis are not exempt from the requirements contained in the Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995. However, cranes which are specially built, or adapted for some lifting operations are exempt from operator licensing, and other regulations, covering Construction and Use, Authorised Weight, and Goods Vehicle Type Approval Regulations. These specially built vehicles are instead authorised to be used on the public highway by Road Vehicles (Authorisation of Special Types) (General) Order 2003 (STGO). The rationale for the difference is that these vehicles are typically used for the purposes of construction and demolition and are normally only used on the public highway on a limited basis to move between sites.
The Department for Transport has previously considered bringing mobile cranes which are not based on an HGV chassis into the scope of operator licensing, most recently when undertaking a review of plating and testing requirements of heavy vehicles which are exempt from roadworthiness testing. At that time, it was not deemed proportionate to include them in the scope of operator licensing. This position is kept under review. |
Telecommunications Cables: Seas and Oceans
Asked by: Earl Attlee (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary) Thursday 19th December 2024 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Lord Vallance of Balham on 3 December (HL Deb cols 1033–1034), whether they have an agreed retaliation doctrine for the cutting of UK undersea cables. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The UK Government constantly monitors and regularly assesses the security of critical national infrastructure, including energy and telecommunications assets in the UK's Exclusive Economic Zone. This is a whole-of-Government effort involving multiple Departments, including the Ministry of Defence. While it is not appropriate for us to discuss the specifics of response options, our adversaries should be in no doubt of our ability to protect the UK and its interests, and that any deliberate attack on UK infrastructure would be met with an appropriate response. |