Information between 16th March 2026 - 26th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mackinlay of Richborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 171 |
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mackinlay of Richborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 182 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 177 |
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mackinlay of Richborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 183 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mackinlay of Richborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 7 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 185 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mackinlay of Richborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 189 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mackinlay of Richborough voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 41 Conservative No votes vs 5 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 58 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mackinlay of Richborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 134 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 191 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mackinlay of Richborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 188 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mackinlay of Richborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 80 Conservative Aye votes vs 9 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 119 Noes - 191 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mackinlay of Richborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 175 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mackinlay of Richborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 158 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mackinlay of Richborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 175 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 156 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mackinlay of Richborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 168 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 145 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Mackinlay of Richborough speeches from: Digital ID: Public Consultation
Lord Mackinlay of Richborough contributed 1 speech (246 words) Wednesday 18th March 2026 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Listed Buildings: Insurance Premium Tax
Asked by: Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 17th March 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the cost of the standard rate of Insurance Premium Tax to (1) listed property homeowners, and (2) the homeowners of properties that are not listed; and what plans they have to (a) exempt, or (b) lower, the rate of Insurance Premium Tax on listed building insurance premiums. Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury) Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) receipts are not broken down by type of insurance; therefore it is not possible to assess the IPT paid by owners of listed and non-listed properties. Insurance pricing is affected by a wide range of factors, and the taxes that insurers pay are just one part of this.
IPT is a broad-based tax which raises important revenue to fund essential public services. The rate of IPT has been unchanged since 2017. The Government keeps all taxes under review and the Chancellor makes decisions at Budgets in the context of the overall public finances.
|
|
Employment: Disability
Asked by: Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 17th March 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answers by Baroness Sherlock on 6 February (HL14003 and HL14004), what plans they have to invite to the Operational Stakeholder Engagement Forum a civilian charity that assists amputees. Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) As part of the Operational Stakeholder Engagement Forum (OSEF), the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) maintains a diverse membership that includes organisations supporting people with a range of disabilities, including amputees. We continually review representation to identify and address any gaps and welcome approaches from organisations that align with our Terms of Reference. We also engage a broader range of stakeholders beyond the OSEF portfolio through insight workshops and one-to-one sessions to support the development of DWP services. |
|
Livestock: UK Trade with EU
Asked by: Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 25th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the proposed UK–EU reset and reduction of barriers to trade on continuing the ban on exports of livestock for slaughter and fattening. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
|
|
Livestock: UK Trade with EU
Asked by: Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 25th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to (1) keep, (2) amend, or (3) repeal the Animal Welfare (Livestock Exports) Act 2024 as part of the proposed UK–EU reset and reduction of trade barriers. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
|
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 30th June 2026 1 p.m. Restoration and Renewal Programme Board - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 27th March 2026
Agendas and papers - R&R Programme Board Agenda - 24 February 2026 Restoration and Renewal Programme Board Committee |
|
Friday 27th March 2026
Minutes and decisions - R&R Programme Board minutes - 24 February 2026 Restoration and Renewal Programme Board Committee |
|
Friday 27th March 2026
Minutes and decisions - R&R Programme Board Sub Board minutes - 23 February 2026 Restoration and Renewal Programme Board Committee |
|
Thursday 2nd April 2026
Report - Restoration and Renewal Quarterly Report Q3 October - December 2025 Restoration and Renewal Programme Board Committee |