Health: Needlestick Injuries Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateCountess of Mar
Main Page: Countess of Mar (Crossbench - Excepted Hereditary)Department Debates - View all Countess of Mar's debates with the Department for Work and Pensions
(13 years, 4 months ago)
Lords Chamber Lord Freud
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Freud 
        
    
        
    
        The judgment was made on the basis of the number of injuries or incidents. Industries with a higher proportion of these were clearly ones on which one would target scarce resources. As I have just explained, the declared figures for injuries from sharps with infection are that 100,000 people a year cut themselves. However, the real concern is how many are infected, and that number is rather low.
 The Countess of Mar
    
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            The Countess of Mar 
        
    
        
    
        My Lords, can the noble Lord say whether the directive referred to in the Question asked by the noble Lord, Lord Walton of Detchant, applies to members of the veterinary profession? At least human patients keep still most of the time. Animals do not, and I know from my own experience what a needlestick injury can produce.
 Lord Freud
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Freud 
        
    
        
    
        This applies to human health and not to other industries such as waste and veterinary.