Debates between Baroness Verma and Lord Hylton during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Energy: Gas Storage

Debate between Baroness Verma and Lord Hylton
Thursday 28th November 2013

(10 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Hylton Portrait Lord Hylton (CB)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, have the Government considered whether existing old gasometers could provide extra storage?

Baroness Verma Portrait Baroness Verma
- Hansard - -

My Lords, as always, the Government constantly review what they are doing to ensure that energy is secure and that the lights stay on. Of course, these reviews take place regularly. However, we are working with Ofgem and National Grid, and are in constant conversation over those matters.

Energy: Shale Gas

Debate between Baroness Verma and Lord Hylton
Tuesday 19th November 2013

(10 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Verma Portrait Baroness Verma
- Hansard - -

My Lords, the noble Lord is absolutely right that this is an important source for us, and as with all things, we are making sure that the environmental protections are in place. We have a very strong regulatory process in this country, as he said. We are doing whatever we can to ensure that the process is followed through smoothly and as quickly as possible so that this industry which is investing in our country is not hindered by unnecessary regulations and red tape.

Lord Hylton Portrait Lord Hylton (CB)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, do the Government consider that there are risks from shale gas exploration for such national assets as, for example, the hot mineral water at Bath and the water flowing through the caves at Cheddar? Are there methods for assessing such risks, and are there ways of preventing harm?

Baroness Verma Portrait Baroness Verma
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I hope that I am making it clear that we take seriously any environmental risk whether it is water contamination or anything else. It is therefore right that the Environment Agency, the Health and Safety Executive and my department work very closely together to ensure that the proper processes are followed through and that all the regulations which need to be in place are in place in order for companies to do their work carefully, safely and properly, and for the country to benefit from the potential.

Severn Barrage

Debate between Baroness Verma and Lord Hylton
Thursday 17th January 2013

(11 years, 5 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Hylton Portrait Lord Hylton
- Hansard - - - Excerpts



To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they expect to announce a decision on the latest plan for a major Severn barrage.

Baroness Verma Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Energy and Climate Change (Baroness Verma)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, we recognise the potential benefits of the barrage after looking at this carefully in a two-year cross-government feasibility study that was completed in October 2010. Before the current proposal can be subject to further consideration, it will need to be developed in considerably more detail to demonstrate, in particular, robust environmental mitigation plans, evidence of the low-head turbine impact, evidence of net regional and national job benefits and affordability for consumers. The Government remain open to hearing about well developed proposals for harnessing energy from the Severn and elsewhere.

Lord Hylton Portrait Lord Hylton
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness for her reply. Does she agree that uncertainty is bad for everyone? If it went ahead, would a big scheme not replace several new nuclear power stations? However, if there is no big scheme it would give us the opportunity to design smaller schemes—for example, at the English Stones or by means of tidal canals. Will the Government at least update and amplify their earlier study so that the earliest possible decision can be reached?

Baroness Verma Portrait Baroness Verma
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I understand the noble Lord’s concerns. The consortium to which he refers submitted a business case to DECC in November 2011. In 2012 we asked for some supplementary information and we have had a series of meetings with the consortium at ministerial and official level, but none of these satisfies having enough of the detailed evidence on the economic and environmental impacts of the scheme that we require. The noble Lord will understand that until we get more detail about the plans it will be difficult to make a decision.

Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill

Debate between Baroness Verma and Lord Hylton
Tuesday 20th December 2011

(12 years, 5 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Hylton Portrait Lord Hylton
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords—

Baroness Verma Portrait Baroness Verma
- Hansard - -

Perhaps the noble Lord could speak first, followed by the noble Baroness.

Lord Hylton Portrait Lord Hylton
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I rise with great caution as a lay man in this very legal debate. However, I read the article in today’s Guardian by the Lord Chancellor, in which he spoke of promoting non-adversarial solutions. I therefore invite the Deputy Leader of the House, when he replies, to tell us a little about how that will work out in practice and to what extent those kinds of solutions will compensate for the very large cut that is proposed to be made to the current legal aid budget.