Baroness Tyler of Enfield: All Documents

Division Vote (Lords)
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 50 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 194

Division Vote (Lords)
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 45 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 140

Division Vote (Lords)
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 51 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 200

Written Question

Tree Felling: Enfield

Tuesday 4th November 2025

Asked by: Baroness Tyler of Enfield (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks made by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 24 April (HL Deb col 756–7), what progress has the Forestry Commission made in its investigation into the illegal felling of the Whitewebbs Oak that took place on 3 April.

Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

It is acknowledged that the works to this ancient tree caused public concern. The Forestry Commission has carried out a site inspection and detailed review to determine whether there have been any breaches of the Forestry Act 1967 in relation to the tree works on the Oak.

The Forestry Commission review has concluded that in this case, there have been no breaches of the Forestry Act 1967 or the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (Forestry) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999.

The decision of the Forestry Commission does not reflect the decisions or actions of other public bodies or individuals who may be conducting investigations or initiating proceedings in relation to any other alleged offences or civil matters other than those set out within the Forestry Act 1967 and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (Forestry) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999.

Division Vote (Lords)
3 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 48 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 227

Division Vote (Lords)
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 49 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 133 Noes - 188

Division Vote (Lords)
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 51 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 128

Division Vote (Lords)
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 141

Division Vote (Lords)
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 52 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 195