Information between 24th May 2026 - 2nd August 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
30 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Thomas of Winchester voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 50 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 150 Noes - 216 |
|
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Thomas of Winchester voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 57 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 146 |
|
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Thomas of Winchester voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 60 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 220 |
|
13 Jul 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Thomas of Winchester voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 11 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 138 |
|
13 Jul 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Thomas of Winchester voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 53 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 239 |
|
8 Jul 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Thomas of Winchester voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 45 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 202 |
|
21 Jul 2026 - Business of the House - View Vote Context Baroness Thomas of Winchester voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 52 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 234 |
|
22 Jul 2026 - Universal Credit, Personal Independence Payment, Jobseeker’s Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance (Decisions and Appeals) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 - View Vote Context Baroness Thomas of Winchester voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 17 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 64 Noes - 95 |
|
15 Jul 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Thomas of Winchester voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 30 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 129 Noes - 188 |
|
15 Jul 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Thomas of Winchester voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 53 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 171 |
|
15 Jul 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Thomas of Winchester voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 49 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 154 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Personal Independence Payment: Medical Examinations
Asked by: Baroness Thomas of Winchester (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Thursday 28th May 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask His Majesty's Government what proportion of assessments for Personal Independence Payment are conducted (1) face to face, and (2) through paper-based review. Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) While this information is not currently published by the department, we will be sharing the data in a future statistical release. |
|
Ambulance Services: Standards
Asked by: Baroness Thomas of Winchester (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Thursday 2nd July 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the state of the UK's fleet of ambulances for use by (1) high dependency patients, and (2) non-high dependency patients. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) NHS England has not undertaken a national assessment categorising the ambulance fleet specifically into vehicles for 'high dependency' and 'non-high dependency' patients, however NHS England routinely collects information from ambulance trusts on fleet composition, age, and utilisation to support national oversight, benchmarking, and fleet replacement planning. Frontline emergency ambulances in England are built to a national specification and are equipped to assess, treat, and transport patients presenting with a wide range of clinical conditions, including those with complex or high-acuity needs. Patient transport services are designed to ensure patients receive a level of transport and support appropriate to their clinical and mobility needs, with national guidance supporting systems in matching patients to the most appropriate vehicle type and service. These vehicles are staffed by appropriately trained clinicians and carry equipment designed to support the delivery of urgent and emergency care. |
|
Access to Work Programme: Visual Impairment
Asked by: Baroness Thomas of Winchester (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Wednesday 8th July 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask His Majesty's Government why some blind or partially sighted recipients of Access to Work funding have had the value of their grants reduced despite their condition remaining unchanged. Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) Access to Work awards are made on the basis of a customer’s work-related needs, rather than their disability or health condition alone. Those needs can change over time, even where the customer’s condition has not changed. This may be because the customer’s role, workplace, working pattern or employer arrangements have changed, or because new solutions or technologies are available that can meet the customer’s needs in a different way. For this reason, support is reassessed at renewal to ensure it remains appropriate to the customer’s current work circumstances.
DWP recognises that while customers greatly value the support provided by the Access to Work scheme, they also have concerns about the scheme’s timeliness, consistency and appreciation of the complex barriers faced by people with disabilities in a modern workplace. The Department is addressing these points in order to deliver an improved scheme that will better help disabled people start and stay in work.
Efforts undertaken by the Department to achieve this include the recruitment of 480 additional staff to help reduce the Access to Work backlog by September 2027. These members of staff will receive extensive training to support them to handle complex applications. In addition, the Department is continuing to engage with a range of stakeholders to develop a richer understanding of the challenges disabled people face. The feedback from this engagement will be used to shape improvements to the scheme that better reflect the current needs of customers. Any improvements to Access to Work will be announced in advance of their implementation. |
|
ADHD: Health Services
Asked by: Baroness Thomas of Winchester (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Monday 6th July 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government whether there are enough NHS healthcare professionals, including clinical psychologists and ADHD specialist nurses, to help the number of young people who are diagnosed with ADHD and anxiety. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government recognises concerns around the sufficiency of National Health Service professionals, including clinical psychologists and specialist staff, to meet rising demand for support, such as young people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and anxiety. We have already delivered on our commitment to recruit an additional 8,500 mental health workers, three years ahead of schedule, which is helping to expand capacity across a range of services and support earlier access to care. However, we are clear that increasing the workforce alone is not enough to meet growing need. That is why we are transforming mental health services through the 10-Year Health Plan, shifting towards prevention and earlier intervention, expanding community-based support, and improving access for children and young people, including through mental health support teams in schools and colleges and wider service improvements. We are also developing a new mental health strategy for England, which will set out how we will go further to improve access, reduce waiting times, and ensure services respond more effectively to rising demand. |