Baroness Stedman-Scott Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Stedman-Scott

Information between 13th July 2026 - 2nd August 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Stedman-Scott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 34 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 38 Noes - 133
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Stedman-Scott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 146 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 146
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Stedman-Scott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 145 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 220
13 Jul 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Stedman-Scott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 35 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 41 Noes - 118
13 Jul 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Stedman-Scott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 117 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 138
13 Jul 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Stedman-Scott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 145 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 239
21 Jul 2026 - Business of the House - View Vote Context
Baroness Stedman-Scott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 234
22 Jul 2026 - Universal Credit, Personal Independence Payment, Jobseeker’s Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance (Decisions and Appeals) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 - View Vote Context
Baroness Stedman-Scott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 56 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 64 Noes - 95
15 Jul 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Stedman-Scott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 119 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 129 Noes - 188
15 Jul 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Stedman-Scott voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 139 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 171


Speeches
Baroness Stedman-Scott speeches from: Universal Credit, Personal Independence Payment, Jobseeker’s Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance (Decisions and Appeals) (Amendment) Regulations 2026
Baroness Stedman-Scott contributed 4 speeches (1,498 words)
Wednesday 22nd July 2026 - Lords Chamber
Home Office
Baroness Stedman-Scott speeches from: Government Record on Education, Employment and Welfare
Baroness Stedman-Scott contributed 1 speech (524 words)
Thursday 16th July 2026 - Lords Chamber
Cabinet Office


Written Answers
Obesity: Drugs
Asked by: Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 16th July 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the value for money of obesity treatments and weight-loss medicines; and whether their impact on sickness absence, workforce participation and wider economic productivity has been taken into account.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) makes recommendations on whether new medicines should be routinely funded by the National Health Service based on an assessment of clinical and cost effectiveness. When assessing treatments, NICE looks at how well they work and whether they represent good value for NHS money. Its standard approach focuses on NHS costs and does not include wider economic factors such as the impact on sickness absence or workforce productivity.

NICE has recommended a number of medicines licensed for the treatment of obesity for use on the NHS using its standard approach to evaluations, and those treatments are now available for the treatment of NHS patients in line with NICE’s guidance.

Unemployment: Young People
Asked by: Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative - Life peer)
Friday 17th July 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government what targets they have set for reducing the number of young people aged 16 and 17 with an unknown education, employment or training status.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

Reducing the number of young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) is a shared priority for government and local authorities, preventing the impacts of disengagement on individuals, the economy and society.

Local authorities support this by maintaining effective systems to identify and support NEET young people. There is already strong practice across the sector, often in the face of significant challenges. The department has written to all local authorities and contacted those where the proportion of young people whose activity is not known is in the highest quintile to provide support and challenge, understand local circumstances, and agree actions.

To support local authorities, we have introduced a new risk of NEET indicator tool and guidance. The department is continuing to refine it with local authorities and monitoring its impact on earlier identification of young people at risk of becoming NEET.

Unemployment: Young People
Asked by: Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative - Life peer)
Friday 17th July 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government what information will be collected to measure the success of the new Risk of NEET Indicator tool.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

Reducing the number of young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) is a shared priority for government and local authorities, preventing the impacts of disengagement on individuals, the economy and society.

Local authorities support this by maintaining effective systems to identify and support NEET young people. There is already strong practice across the sector, often in the face of significant challenges. The department has written to all local authorities and contacted those where the proportion of young people whose activity is not known is in the highest quintile to provide support and challenge, understand local circumstances, and agree actions.

To support local authorities, we have introduced a new risk of NEET indicator tool and guidance. The department is continuing to refine it with local authorities and monitoring its impact on earlier identification of young people at risk of becoming NEET.

Unemployment: Young People
Asked by: Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative - Life peer)
Friday 17th July 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the reasons why 32,100 young people aged 16 and 17 have an unknown education, employment or training status.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

Reducing the number of young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) is a shared priority for government and local authorities, preventing the impacts of disengagement on individuals, the economy and society.

Local authorities support this by maintaining effective systems to identify and support NEET young people. There is already strong practice across the sector, often in the face of significant challenges. The department has written to all local authorities and contacted those where the proportion of young people whose activity is not known is in the highest quintile to provide support and challenge, understand local circumstances, and agree actions.

To support local authorities, we have introduced a new risk of NEET indicator tool and guidance. The department is continuing to refine it with local authorities and monitoring its impact on earlier identification of young people at risk of becoming NEET.

Employment: Obesity
Asked by: Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 20th July 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to assess the impact of obesity treatment on economic inactivity and workforce participation.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Government recognises that obesity is associated with significant labour market challenges, including reduced workforce participation and increased sickness absence. The Government remains committed to monitoring emerging evidence to better understand the full range of health and economic benefits associated with obesity treatments. Indeed, the evidence base for the impact of health interventions on employment outcomes is rapidly growing, with very robust evidence on the impact of bariatric surgery and Talking Therapies.

Obesity: Drugs
Asked by: Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 20th July 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government what metrics they plan to use in future studies on weight-loss medicines to assess employment outcomes, workforce participation and sickness absence.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

Studies currently underway in the United Kingdom are examining outcomes which include employment status, work productivity, and sickness absence. For example, the industry funded SURMOUNT-REAL study will examine employment status and work productivity outcomes alongside other factors. The Government funded Scotland CardioMetabolic Impact Study will include an assessment of how improved health through weight loss may help people remain in work and reduce sick leave.

Children: Maintenance
Asked by: Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 20th July 2026

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask His Majesty's Government, in light of their commitment in 2023 to include unearned income in the standard calculation used by the Child Maintenance Service, when they intend to introduce the necessary legislation to facilitate this.

Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The Department has recently completed a review of the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) calculation. This was underpinned by a substantial programme of research the results of which have been published.

Following the review, the Government intends to reduce the income tolerance from 25 per cent to 15 per cent so that changes in income are reflected more quickly in maintenance calculations. The Government also intends to include unearned income within the standard calculation, helping to ensure liabilities more accurately reflect a parent's financial circumstances and that more money reaches children.

Secondary legislation is required before implementation, which is subject to parliamentary approval. Further details on legislation and implementation will be communicated in due course.

We remain committed to ensuring that the CMS provides an effective service for separated parents and their children and continue to keep the operation of the child maintenance system under review and will consider any future changes in the context of wider priorities for supporting children and families.

Children: Maintenance
Asked by: Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 20th July 2026

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will reconsider the cancellation of the public consultation on the Child Maintenance Service's calculation process.

Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The Department has recently completed a review of the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) calculation. This was underpinned by a substantial programme of research the results of which have been published.

Following the review, the Government intends to reduce the income tolerance from 25 per cent to 15 per cent so that changes in income are reflected more quickly in maintenance calculations. The Government also intends to include unearned income within the standard calculation, helping to ensure liabilities more accurately reflect a parent's financial circumstances and that more money reaches children.

Secondary legislation is required before implementation, which is subject to parliamentary approval. Further details on legislation and implementation will be communicated in due course.

We remain committed to ensuring that the CMS provides an effective service for separated parents and their children and continue to keep the operation of the child maintenance system under review and will consider any future changes in the context of wider priorities for supporting children and families.

Child Maintenance Service: Telephone Services
Asked by: Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 21st July 2026

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that Child Maintenance Service users who are assigned to the specialist domestic abuse caseworker team are transferred to that team when they contact the Child Maintenance Service helpline.

Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The Government is committed to ensuring that victims and survivors of domestic abuse receive the support they need when using the Child Maintenance Service (CMS).

The CMS has a Specialist Caseworker team that provides targeted support for customers experiencing the most challenging or complex domestic abuse situations. All CMS caseworkers receive training to identify indicators of domestic abuse and to refer appropriate cases to the specialist team.

Once the CMS has moved a customer’s case into the Specialist Caseworker team, all inbound calls from that customer will route directly to that team. If the automated call routing cannot identify the customer, their call will go to a different team, but all caseworkers are trained to identify this and will reroute the call to the Specialist Caseworker Team. CMS has strengthened telephony quality assurance arrangements and provided targeted training for team leaders on service standards, coaching and feedback. These measures are designed to support consistent service delivery and help ensure customers requiring specialist support are identified and transferred appropriately.

Universal Credit: Foreign Nationals
Asked by: Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative - Life peer)
Friday 31st July 2026

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the numbers of non-British nationals claiming Universal Credit.

Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

Figures are routinely published of the number of non ‘Common Travel Area’ (CTA) nationals in the Universal Credit statistics available on GOV.UK.

From the most recently published Universal Credit statistics, there were 8.3 million people on Universal Credit in January 2026, and the percentage of those people by nationality group, compiled from Table 2 of the immigration and nationality data tables, is shown in the table below.

Table 1: Proportion of People on Universal Credit by Nationality group, Great Britain, January 2026

January 2026 (%)

CTA - UK, Ireland, Right of Abode

85%

EEA (Excluding Ireland)

7%

Non-EEA

6%

No nationality recorded on digital systems

2%

Source: DWP Universal Credit - Immigration Status and Nationality statistics

Notes:

  1. The latest non-missing Nationality declared by the claimant, reported across all previous UC claims.
  2. CTA – The Common Travel Area (CTA) is a special travel zone that allows for free movement between the UK, Ireland, the Isle of Man, and the Channel Islands (Jersey, Guernsey).
  3. “CTA – UK, Ireland, Right of Abode”: British nationals, Irish nationals, and people with right of abode in the UK do not need an immigration status to claim Universal Credit.
  4. “EEA (Excluding Ireland)”: Those with nationalities from the 27 European Union (EU) member states, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway.
  5. “Non-EEA”: A person who is not an EEA citizen and is not a British citizen.
  6. “No nationality recorded on digital systems”: The individual has not provided their nationality during their claim.
  7. If a claimant has dual nationality and one is CTA then they will be recorded as CTA - UK, Ireland, Right of Abode.
  8. Right of Abode individuals include Commonwealth citizens.



Baroness Stedman-Scott mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

16 Jul 2026, 1:52 p.m. - House of Lords
"Noble Baroness Stedman-scott and Spielman bemoan the fact that the "
Baroness Smith of Malvern, Minister of State (Education) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
22 Jul 2026, 7:24 p.m. - House of Lords
"motion in the name of Baroness Stedman-Scott be agreed to? As many content. >> Content. >> Content not content. "
Division - View Video - View Transcript
22 Jul 2026, 6:34 p.m. - House of Lords
"by the noble Lady Baroness Stedman-Scott, there was much in what she remarked, what she said "
Lord Davies of Brixton (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
22 Jul 2026, 6:26 p.m. - House of Lords
"Baroness Stedman-Scott. "
Lord Lansley (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript
22 Jul 2026, 7:08 p.m. - House of Lords
"support the regret motion. >> My Lords, I'm grateful to the noble Lady Baroness Stedman-Scott "
Lord Palmer of Childs Hill (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript
22 Jul 2026, 7:14 p.m. - House of Lords
"to give people the opportunities that they really need? In response to the Lord Brady Baroness Stedman-Scott, as my noble friend "
Baroness Sherlock, The Minister of State, Department for Work and Pensions (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
16 Jul 2026, 12:43 p.m. - House of Lords
"record in DWP during Covid, but actually working with my noble friend Baroness Stedman-Scott, we got unemployment rate down to a "
Baroness Coffey (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript
16 Jul 2026, 1:26 p.m. - House of Lords
"on young people but on the wrong things. My neighbours, friends Baroness Coffey, Baroness Stedman-Scott, Lord Willetts and "
Baroness Spielman (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript


Select Committee Documents
Thursday 23rd July 2026
Minutes and decisions - Note of discussion on 3 February 2026

Administration Committee

Found: Baroness Humprheys Baroness Williams of Trafford Apologies: Earl of Kinnoull, Lord Mawson, Baroness Stedman-Scott

Thursday 23rd July 2026
Minutes and decisions - Note of discussion on 4 November 2025

Administration Committee

Found: Lord Faulkner of Worcester Baroness Wilcox of Newport Apologies: Max Wilkinson, Baroness Stedman Scott

Thursday 16th July 2026
Minutes and decisions - Minutes - 3rd Meeting - 16 June 2026

Services Committee

Found: The Chair announced that Baroness Stedman-Scott had left the Committee, the Committee thanked her for