Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson

Information between 17th March 2026 - 27th March 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 40 Conservative Aye votes vs 6 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 163
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Conservative No votes vs 80 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 119 Noes - 191
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 78 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 148
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 44 Conservative Aye votes vs 4 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 70 Noes - 166
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 134 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 191
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 131 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 188
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 110
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 113
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 140 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 107
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 121 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 118
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 118
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 155
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 156 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 225
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 175
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 159
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 158
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 175 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 156
25 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 81 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 137
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 147
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 135 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 150
25 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 168 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 145
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 134 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 148
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 195
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 141
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 101 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 197
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 104 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 146


Written Answers
Government Departments: Recruitment
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer)
Wednesday 18th March 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 February (HL14386), how they will monitor whether individual departments and agencies change their hiring procedures and practices to place greater value on frontline delivery, innovation and private sector experience.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Departments and agencies have delegated authority to determine their own practices and procedures for the recruitment of staff to the Civil Service, including the Senior Civil Service (SCS), as outlined in the Civil Service Management Code.

The Government People Group are collaborating with dedicated SCS Recruitment leads from the core Government departments to support them in sharing best practice and making relevant changes to their hiring practices, in line with the ambition set out in the Chief Secretary to the Prime Ministers’ speech of 20 January 2026.

Autism: Diagnosis
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer)
Wednesday 18th March 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of NHS England's proposals in the consultation on the 2026/27 NHS Payment Scheme to set a £950 guide price for both adult and children and young people's autism assessments, given that children and young people's assessments includes additional components not required for adult assessments.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

NHS England was advised by a number of clinicians, policy professionals, commissioners, and providers of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism diagnostic assessment services prior to the publication of the NHS Payment Scheme consultation. All National Health Service providers, commissioners, and independent sector providers of NHS-funded autism and ADHD services were invited to an NHS Payment Scheme engagement session in September.

The statutory consultation for the NHS Payment Scheme 2026/27, which closed on 16 December 2025, provided an opportunity for all stakeholders to review the consultation guidance and provide comments and feedback. This consultation was open to the public, but NHS England specifically reached out to all NHS providers, commissioners, and independent sector providers of NHS-funded autism diagnostic assessment services and ADHD services to ensure they were aware and were able to respond to the NHS Payment Scheme consultation.

NHS England are currently reviewing this feedback to inform the final 2026/27 Payment Scheme.

Neurodiversity: Diagnosis
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer)
Wednesday 18th March 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government, in regard to the consultation on the 2026/27 NHS Payment Scheme, why NHS England have proposed the same guide price for adult and child autism assessments and different guide prices for child and adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder assessments.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

NHS England was advised by a number of clinicians, policy professionals, commissioners, and providers of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism diagnostic assessment services prior to the publication of the NHS Payment Scheme consultation. All National Health Service providers, commissioners, and independent sector providers of NHS-funded autism and ADHD services were invited to an NHS Payment Scheme engagement session in September.

The statutory consultation for the NHS Payment Scheme 2026/27, which closed on 16 December 2025, provided an opportunity for all stakeholders to review the consultation guidance and provide comments and feedback. This consultation was open to the public, but NHS England specifically reached out to all NHS providers, commissioners, and independent sector providers of NHS-funded autism diagnostic assessment services and ADHD services to ensure they were aware and were able to respond to the NHS Payment Scheme consultation.

NHS England are currently reviewing this feedback to inform the final 2026/27 Payment Scheme.

Neurodiversity: Diagnosis
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 19th March 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they intend that the 2026/27 NHS Payment Scheme consultation outcome in respect of guide prices for ADHD and autism assessments will be agreed to by Ministers before implementation.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The full responsibility for developing and setting the National Tariff, which is a set of rules, prices, and guidance that determine how providers of National Health Service funded healthcare are paid for the services they provide, was given to NHS England through the Health and Social Care Act 2012. The Health and Care Act 2022 confirmed this responsibility and renamed the ‘National Tariff’ to the ‘NHS Payment Scheme’. The legislation relating to the NHS Payment Scheme is set out in schedule 10 of the 2022 Act.

Under NHS England’s ‘Scheme of Delegation’, responsibility for approving the NHS Payment Scheme rests with the Chief Executive Officer of NHS England, delated to the Chief Financial Officer of NHS England. Ministerial agreement of the consultation is not currently a requirement of the regulations set out in the act.

NHS England will continue to work with policy teams at the Department and wider stakeholders to further develop currencies and consider appropriate payment options for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism, in line with the overall direction set by ministers.

Senior Civil Servants: Performance Appraisal
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 19th March 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, with regard to the speech by the Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister on 20 January, how key performance indicators (KPIs) for senior civil servants will be set by ministers; whether individual ministers will have total autonomy to set their own KPIs; over what time period those KPIs will be assessed; and whether those KPIs will be changed when a minister changes.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Performance arrangements for members of the Senior Civil Service stem from a centrally set performance management framework, which makes clear that the objectives should be linked directly to the objectives of the department and minister they serve. These are then assessed by their line manager, throughout the performance year.

Prescription Drugs: Cost Effectiveness
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 23rd March 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 11 March (HL15135), in what circumstances a direction under the statutory instrument coming into force on 24 March would not be made.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

It is important that there is stability in the medicines regulatory and access landscape, and there should be a high bar for making changes to the cost-effectiveness threshold. It is the Government’s intention, therefore, that the power to set the cost-effectiveness threshold would be used rarely.

Public Bodies
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 24th March 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, with regard to the speech by the Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister on 20 January, which "Prime Ministerial priorities" will be assigned to new teams modelled on the Vaccines Taskforce; and which ministers will sponsor those teams.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Number 10 and the Cabinet Office are continuing to work together and with departments to consider taskforces across the Prime Minister’s priorities.

Arms Length Bodies
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer)
Friday 27th March 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 2 February (HL13762), what progress they have made in the arm's length bodies review; when they expect that review to be completed; and when they will publish its findings.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

I refer the Noble Lady to my answer to HL13762.:

Question:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 19 January (HL13276), when the arm's length bodies (ALB) review will be completed; and whether its findings will be published.

Answer:

The review is ongoing. Outcomes will be communicated in due course.




Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Wednesday 17th June 2026 11 a.m.
Public Services Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 24th June 2026 11 a.m.
Public Services Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Thursday 19th March 2026
Government Response - Letter Conveying DWP Response to Public Services Committee Letter Sent For Clarifying Answers (06 March 2026)

Public Services Committee


Select Committee Inquiry
24 Mar 2026
The role of ambulance services in supporting accident and emergency departments
Public Services Committee (Select)
Not accepting submissions

No description available